Federal Regulators Accuse BSG of Widespread 'Bll Cramming'

By Beecher Tuttle May 08, 2012

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) has accused the nation's largest third-party billing company of scamming more than $70 million from consumers by adding unauthorized charges to phone bills through a practice known as "cramming."

Regulators claim Texas-based Billing Services Group (BSG) added unauthorized charges to approximately 1.2 million telephone lines for nine "enhanced services" like voicemail, streaming video and theft protection services. The complaint alleges that BSG placed the charges on behalf of a "serial phone crammer," and failed to investigate the "highly deceptive" marketing of the services or if they were ever ordered and used by consumers.

The allegation represents the fourth such action by the FTC to address extensive cramming by BSG entities. The commission claims that BSG violated a 1999 settlement that prohibits billing for vendors that who "fail to clearly disclose the terms of their services." In addition, BSG is alleged to have continued to charge for fraudulent services despite "voluminous complaints" from consumers and telephone companies.

Verizon even terminated BSG's ability to charge for a certain voicemail service due to perceived cramming violations, yet the company continued the practice through other local telephone providers, according to the complaint.

The FTC has asked a federal court to force BSG to pay $52.6 million, the amount the company billed for but never fully repaid to consumers.

"BSG made it possible for con artists to steal people's hard-earned money by placing charges on phone bills for services they never ordered or used," said David Vladeck, Director of the FTC's Bureau of Consumer Protection. "Under previous federal court orders, BSG cannot profit from the fraud of others and then deny responsibility for the harm they made possible."

In a statement, BSG called the motion "incomplete and inaccurate," noting that the investigation centered on Alternate Billing Corp, a former BSG client that is not an entity of BSG.

"Apparently, the FTC's view is that, because BSG settled litigation 13 years ago, BSG is liable for contempt whenever a service provider is able to evade the compliance measures implemented by BSG, regardless of BSG's diligence and good faith," the statement read. "The bottom line is that the FTC is trying to blame BSG for the acts of another party."




Edited by Brooke Neuman

TechZone360 Contributor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Why Blockchain Could Be a Gamechanger

By: Paula Bernier    1/22/2018

Blockchain has become closely associated with the controversial topic of cryptocurrency. And that's fine because blockchain is an enabling technology …

Read More

Consumer Privacy in the Digital Era: Three Trends to Watch

By: Special Guest    1/18/2018

Digital advertising has exploded in recent years, with the latest eMarketer data forecasting $83 billion in revenue this year and continued growth on …

Read More

CES 2018: Terabit Fiber - Closer Than We Think

By: Doug Mohney    1/17/2018

One of the biggest challenges for 5G and last mile 10 Gig deployments is not raw data speeds, but middle mile and core networks. The wireless industry…

Read More

10 Benefits of Drone-Based Asset Inspections

By: Frank Segarra    1/15/2018

Although a new and emerging technology, (which is still evolving), in early 2018, most companies are not aware of the possible benefits they can achie…

Read More

VR Could Change Entertainment Forever

By: Special Guest    1/11/2018

VR could change everything from how we play video games to how we interact with our friends and family. VR has the power to change how we consume all …

Read More