Apple's CEO May Have Footed the Bill for Apple's Patent Lawsuit Loss in China

By Oliver VanDervoort July 09, 2012

While Apple rarely loses a patent court fight, they did indeed lose to Chinese company Proview. The iPad maker was ordered to pay about $60 million to Proview and in what can only be described as an illustration of the massive amount of money Apple’s CEO is raking in, it seems that Cook basically paid this fee out of his own wallet. 

Tim Cook recently turned down a $75 million dividend payment from the company, and it appears one of the reasons he did that was so that the company would have the funds available to pay off the court’s fee. In essence, Cook paid the fine himself.

The reasoning behind Cook personally taking this particular fine, according to business insiders in the industry, is that the company made a mistake in this particular patent fight. Those same insiders believe that because this was an actual mistake made by somebody high up in the company, the cost of the lawsuit should not be placed onto the company’s investors. Despite the fact that the patent infringement the company was responsible for was before Cook’s time, he is now the man in charge and therefore had to step up.

At the heart of this particular suit was a claim by Proview that Apple had acquired the name ‘IPad’ in a deceptive way. Apple set up a subsidiary and named the company IP Application Development Ltd (IPADL) and bought the name iPad from Proview’s Taiwanese affiliate for just $55,000. Agents from IPADL told Proview that the name was merely a shortening of their company and that they would not compete with Proview in China. Apple released the iPad just a few months after these successful negotiations. 

It appears that Apple didn’t exactly behave responsibly in any of the dealings with Proview. During the lawsuit, Apple claimed that Proview was trying to extort as much as $3 billion from them. They later claimed the Chinese company was looking for $400 million. Proview has saidthat the $60 million they earned from the lawsuit was about the number they had been seeking all along.

Edited by Brooke Neuman

Contributing Writer

Related Articles

Bloomberg BETA: Models Are Key to Machine Intelligence

By: Paula Bernier    4/19/2018

James Cham, partner at seed fund Bloomberg BETA, was at Cisco Collaboration Summit today talking about the importance of models to the future of machi…

Read More

Get Smart About Influencer Attribution in a Blockchain World

By: Maurice Nagle    4/16/2018

The retail value chain is in for a blockchain-enabled overhaul, with smarter relationships, delivering enhanced transparency across an environment of …

Read More

Facebook Flip-Flopping on GDPR

By: Maurice Nagle    4/12/2018

With GDPR on the horizon, Zuckerberg in Congress testifying and Facebook users questioning loyalty, change is coming. What that change will look like,…

Read More

The Next Phase of Flash Storage and the Mid-Sized Business

By: Joanna Fanuko    4/11/2018

Organizations amass profuse amounts of data these days, ranging from website traffic metrics to online customer surveys. Collectively, AI, IoT and eve…

Read More

Satellite Imaging - Petabytes of Developer, Business Opportunities

By: Doug Mohney    4/11/2018

Hollywood has programmed society into believing satellite imaging as a magic, all-seeing tool, but the real trick is in analysis. Numerous firms are f…

Read More