Apple's CEO May Have Footed the Bill for Apple's Patent Lawsuit Loss in China

By Oliver VanDervoort July 09, 2012

While Apple rarely loses a patent court fight, they did indeed lose to Chinese company Proview. The iPad maker was ordered to pay about $60 million to Proview and in what can only be described as an illustration of the massive amount of money Apple’s CEO is raking in, it seems that Cook basically paid this fee out of his own wallet. 

Tim Cook recently turned down a $75 million dividend payment from the company, and it appears one of the reasons he did that was so that the company would have the funds available to pay off the court’s fee. In essence, Cook paid the fine himself.

The reasoning behind Cook personally taking this particular fine, according to business insiders in the industry, is that the company made a mistake in this particular patent fight. Those same insiders believe that because this was an actual mistake made by somebody high up in the company, the cost of the lawsuit should not be placed onto the company’s investors. Despite the fact that the patent infringement the company was responsible for was before Cook’s time, he is now the man in charge and therefore had to step up.

At the heart of this particular suit was a claim by Proview that Apple had acquired the name ‘IPad’ in a deceptive way. Apple set up a subsidiary and named the company IP Application Development Ltd (IPADL) and bought the name iPad from Proview’s Taiwanese affiliate for just $55,000. Agents from IPADL told Proview that the name was merely a shortening of their company and that they would not compete with Proview in China. Apple released the iPad just a few months after these successful negotiations. 

It appears that Apple didn’t exactly behave responsibly in any of the dealings with Proview. During the lawsuit, Apple claimed that Proview was trying to extort as much as $3 billion from them. They later claimed the Chinese company was looking for $400 million. Proview has saidthat the $60 million they earned from the lawsuit was about the number they had been seeking all along.

Edited by Brooke Neuman

Contributing Writer

Related Articles

Why Blockchain Could Be a Gamechanger

By: Paula Bernier    1/22/2018

Blockchain has become closely associated with the controversial topic of cryptocurrency. And that's fine because blockchain is an enabling technology …

Read More

Consumer Privacy in the Digital Era: Three Trends to Watch

By: Special Guest    1/18/2018

Digital advertising has exploded in recent years, with the latest eMarketer data forecasting $83 billion in revenue this year and continued growth on …

Read More

CES 2018: Terabit Fiber - Closer Than We Think

By: Doug Mohney    1/17/2018

One of the biggest challenges for 5G and last mile 10 Gig deployments is not raw data speeds, but middle mile and core networks. The wireless industry…

Read More

10 Benefits of Drone-Based Asset Inspections

By: Frank Segarra    1/15/2018

Although a new and emerging technology, (which is still evolving), in early 2018, most companies are not aware of the possible benefits they can achie…

Read More

VR Could Change Entertainment Forever

By: Special Guest    1/11/2018

VR could change everything from how we play video games to how we interact with our friends and family. VR has the power to change how we consume all …

Read More