Apple: 2012 is '1984'

By Doug Mohney September 07, 2012

Apple's "1984" Macintosh Super Bowl ad (in the video below) won numerous awards and stunned people with its bold message of an upstart company fighting an established me-too world of Personal Computing. Featuring a hammer-thrower being chased by faceless police with clubs through a depressing, Orwellian world of worker drones, it is a stunning commercial. 

Unfortunately, it is also prophetic and ironic as to what Apple has actually become – not the upstart anymore, but a faceless, secrecy-obsessed megacorporation unafraid to use its power.

Back in 1984, the "enemy" was IBM and Microsoft, building bland and boring PCs. The hardware wasn't sexy, but it was affordable and open, and people could do whatever they wanted.

Against this unspoken framework, Apple – the young, vibrant "hammer thrower" – arrives to break the existing order and enslavement of the masses.

Today, content and phone companies are the enslaved – some real irony there. If you don't have an app and content for the Apple iPhings family (iPhone, iPad, iPod) you aren't in the market, given Apple's dominance of the phone and tablet space. Apple has dictated terms to the wireless industry when it comes to the iPhone, with carriers paying full price for underwriting the iPhone and signing up for hefty sales commitments.

It's the whispering background noise in the Apple "1984" ad that resonates with 2012, the words of a thin, glasses-wearing "Supreme Leader" heard in the background as the hammer thrower makes her run to smash the "screen" of PC and IT convention.

"Today we celebrate the first glorious anniversary of the Information Purification Directives," said the leader. "We have created for the first time in all history a garden of pure ideology, where each worker may bloom, secure from the pests of any contradictory true thoughts."

Call me cynical, but I'd say those "Information Purification Directives" sound a lot like Apple's patent defense case against Samsung. Rounded square icons and ornamental design of the iPhone (with different patents for black and while phones are points Apple "won" in its case.  

"A garden of pure ideology" fits Apple's design philosophy perfectly. It's a garden called iTunes, where consumers can buy Apple-approved content and owners of content pay a cut.  It is also a "pure" user interface for the Apple iPad that insists the user has no need for a mouse and should resort to using fingers on the screen at all times – never mind that you would want to be so gauche as to plug in a simple USB memory stick or an SD card from a camera.  

Finally, the hammer-thrower is chased by a group of faceless police. Apple's obsession with secrecy culminating in legal action against bloggers and enlisting California police help in raiding the home of Gizmodo's editor certainly smacks of Orwellian tactics and heavy-handedness.

Perhaps the most ironic part of this Black-is-White tale for 2012 is finding someone to root for. If Apple is the enemy, does this make Google the hammer-thrower? Or is often-scorned Microsoft ready to step forward to become a hero against Apple marketplace dominance in the tablet and phone arenas?




Edited by Braden Becker

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

US Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals Validates Class Action Suit Over Data Breach

By: Peter Bernstein    7/27/2015

Since what follows is about legal matters, let me start with the disclosure that I am not a lawyer, have no legal training and this is not an attempt …

Read More

The Do's and Don'ts of Viral Content Promotion

By: Drew Hendricks    7/27/2015

Viral content promotion is the word we use to describe content that just simply takes off on its own. It creates a brand out of nothing and can quickl…

Read More

Windows 10: Z Generation is When Everything Will Change.

By: Rob Enderle    7/24/2015

I started looking at the new Windows 10 ads and it got me thinking about how much change we will have seen that the next generation of Windows users w…

Read More

AT&T-DirecTV Merger May Benefit Consumers in a Big Way

By: Tara Seals    7/24/2015

The FCC is about to approve a $49 billion merger between AT&T and DirecTV, the No. 1 US satellite TV provider, and if the conditions that the commissi…

Read More

AT&T, House of Cards and Net Neutrality

By: Doug Mohney    7/22/2015

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is green lighting AT&T's $49 billion takeover of DirecTV, in exchange for promises to abide by stricter Ne…

Read More