Privacy Groups Say Government Broadband Speed Tests Open Door to Legal Snooping

By Tracey E. Schelmetic October 12, 2012

If you’re concerned about the speed of broadband you’re getting from your carrier – making sure you get what you pay for, since sometimes speeds don’t meet promises from carriers – you may visit one of many test sites that confirm your speed.

Some of these test sites are government sponsored, such as that found on Broadband.gov.

One group is warning consumers they may be getting more than a speed test; they may be providing the government a good snoop around their browsing history. In fact, you may be turning over information that could allow law enforcement agencies to review their Internet activity without due process or judicial scrutiny.

Information collected by the tests includes users’ IP addresses, street addresses, mobile handset latitude/longitude data and unique handset identification numbers.

A coalition of public interest groups sent a letter today to FCC head Julius Genachowski to express strong concerns about the practice, which the FCC claims is legal and appropriate, according to the Competitive Enterprise Institute.

“The potential for government to abuse citizens’ personal information poses a unique threat to individual freedom,” said Ryan Radia, associate director of technology studies at the Competitive Enterprise Institute. “Therefore, federal agencies bear a unique burden of justifying, disclosing and minimizing their collection and use of personal data.”

The Coalition said its goal is to urge the FCC to carefully evaluate the privacy implications of its broadband testing program and implement measures to enhance privacy, including:

  • Disclosing personal information to other government agencies for purposes unrelated to broadband testing only when doing so is required by law
  • Minimizing its collection and retention of potentially sensitive personal information (including street addresses and handset identification numbers)
  • Where the collection of such information is justified, properly de-identifying the data to preserve its value and protect the identities of individuals and their locations
  • Regularly disclosing how personal information, including street addresses, is retained, used and shared with other governmental agencies
  • Imposing the same limits on the public disclosure of IP addresses by the FCC’s contractors, M-Lab and Ookla, and its other software partners.

A copy of the letter sent to the FCC can be found here.




Edited by Braden Becker

TechZone360 Contributor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

New York City Mayor de Blasio Makes $70 Million Commitment to Universal Broadband

By: Peter Bernstein    5/6/2015

It was no doubt a coincidence, but at the Tech Crunch Disrupt conference in New York City this week, the city's Mayor, Bill de Blasio, took a rather b…

Read More

Is a New CEO Enough for Cisco?

By: Doug Mohney    5/5/2015

After 20 years as commander-in-chief, John Chambers is moving from CEO to executive chairman. His replacement will be Charles Robbins, who joined the …

Read More

Advanced Threat Sophistication Drives Fresh Detection Methods

By: Tara Seals    5/5/2015

More sophisticated cyber-security threats are changing the threat detection landscape, and requiring companies to think differently about how they loo…

Read More

Elance-oDesk Relaunches as Upwork, Unveils New Freelance Talent Platform

By: Peter Bernstein    5/5/2015

One of the things we in the technology industries are keenly aware of and focused on goes under the generic appellation, "the changing nature of work.…

Read More

Carly Fiorina For President: Why She May Be the Best Candidate for the Job

By: Rob Enderle    5/4/2015

Let's start out by saying I was anything but a huge fan of Carly Fiorina when she was CEO of HP, but everything is relative and I've come to look at m…

Read More