McAfee Retracts its 'Koobface' Malware Count and Provides Correction

By Peter Bernstein June 10, 2013

It is a fact of life that we all make mistakes. The challenge in the Internet era is that when we make them that can go viral. Hopefully the corrections do as well, although this tends to be problematic. While I have made more than my fair share of miscues, and happen to believe that possibly the best way we learn is from our mistakes, McAfee made a faux pas last week that it is trying to address, and this is one that needs to go in the collective memory bank.

Last week there was a very popular posting about McAfee’s release of its McAfee Threats Report for Q1 2013. As all of us who wrote about this important report noted, it found amongst a variety of things a surge in spam, Koobface and MBR attacks. The problem is that since publication of the report it turns out the Koobface information was not just inaccurate, but off by more than a smidgeon.

This has prompted McAfee Labs, in the form of Craig Schmuger’s blog, to post a retraction.   In fairness to McAfee, the entire post reproduced below for purposes of clarification.

The McAfee Threats Report for the first quarter of 2013 highlighted a noteworthy increase in the number of Koobface malware samples on record. This data point is based on the number of unique malicious files associated with the Koobface family, and is generally one indicator of active malware development. Besides the number of changes made to a malware’s code base, sample counts can also be influenced by repacking of the same underlying code (a common evasion tactic used by malware distributors), garbage data or junk instructions added to binaries, and other forms of server or client polymorphisms (such as self-modifying code or web server scripts that result in a unique binary being served with each download). Another complication arises from what is often called a cocktail, in which a parasitic virus inhabits a host file that is itself another piece of malware.

These factors led to our Koobface statistics being off by a large margin. The corrected data below shows Koobface on a continuing decline since Facebook published its landmark post “Facebook’s Continued Fight Against Koobface” nearly a year and a half ago.




Edited by Ashley Caputo
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Four Reasons to Reach for the Cloud after World Earth Day

By: Special Guest    4/23/2018

The World Earth Day agenda offers a chance to flip the rationale for cloud adoption and highlight environmental benefits that the technology brings pr…

Read More

Bloomberg BETA: Models Are Key to Machine Intelligence

By: Paula Bernier    4/19/2018

James Cham, partner at seed fund Bloomberg BETA, was at Cisco Collaboration Summit today talking about the importance of models to the future of machi…

Read More

Get Smart About Influencer Attribution in a Blockchain World

By: Maurice Nagle    4/16/2018

The retail value chain is in for a blockchain-enabled overhaul, with smarter relationships, delivering enhanced transparency across an environment of …

Read More

Facebook Flip-Flopping on GDPR

By: Maurice Nagle    4/12/2018

With GDPR on the horizon, Zuckerberg in Congress testifying and Facebook users questioning loyalty, change is coming. What that change will look like,…

Read More

The Next Phase of Flash Storage and the Mid-Sized Business

By: Joanna Fanuko    4/11/2018

Organizations amass profuse amounts of data these days, ranging from website traffic metrics to online customer surveys. Collectively, AI, IoT and eve…

Read More