More Freedom or Less?

By Gary Kim January 17, 2014

Without any question, the single most influential book I ever have read, dealing with regulatory policy, was Prof. Ithiel de Sola Pool’s “Technologies of Freedom.” The gist: In the United States, regulators have applied different frameworks to different industries.

The implication: As it becomes possible for all forms of content and communications to be provided by contestants in different industries, regulators and policymakers face a fundamental question.

Should they apply the most-restrictive rules to formerly more-free industries, or, under entirely new circumstances, extend more freedom to all industries? That has been the key challenge, for decades.

The quick summary is that there has been fullest freedom in the print sphere, restricted freedom in the broadcast domain, and a degree of freedom in between print and broadcast for the cable TV medium.

Common carrier has been the least-free model of regulation, having been applied to telcos.

With the advent of the Internet, application providers have been regulated on the “most free” print model.

All of that has become more complicated. Apps offer voice and messaging features, while both cable and telcos sell identical services, including content, under distinctly-different and unequal regulatory regimes.

Dr. Pool’s approach always was to argue for extending “press” style freedoms--the print media being the “most free” of all media--to all electronic media.

And that remains the basic conundrum: when creating a hopefully fair and new regime, fostering innovation and cognizant of robust competition, should freedom be taken away, or should freedom be extended?

Either way arguably would create rules that are “fair” in the sense of regulating all like providers the same way. But most observers might agree that innovation is fastest when suppliers are free to move quickly, in a climate of freedom, and especially when markets are undergoing fundamental change.

Allowing more freedom is one approach. Less freedom is the other. Some of us would vote for freedom.

Edited by Stefania Viscusi

Contributing Editor

Related Articles

Bloomberg BETA: Models Are Key to Machine Intelligence

By: Paula Bernier    4/19/2018

James Cham, partner at seed fund Bloomberg BETA, was at Cisco Collaboration Summit today talking about the importance of models to the future of machi…

Read More

Get Smart About Influencer Attribution in a Blockchain World

By: Maurice Nagle    4/16/2018

The retail value chain is in for a blockchain-enabled overhaul, with smarter relationships, delivering enhanced transparency across an environment of …

Read More

Facebook Flip-Flopping on GDPR

By: Maurice Nagle    4/12/2018

With GDPR on the horizon, Zuckerberg in Congress testifying and Facebook users questioning loyalty, change is coming. What that change will look like,…

Read More

The Next Phase of Flash Storage and the Mid-Sized Business

By: Joanna Fanuko    4/11/2018

Organizations amass profuse amounts of data these days, ranging from website traffic metrics to online customer surveys. Collectively, AI, IoT and eve…

Read More

Satellite Imaging - Petabytes of Developer, Business Opportunities

By: Doug Mohney    4/11/2018

Hollywood has programmed society into believing satellite imaging as a magic, all-seeing tool, but the real trick is in analysis. Numerous firms are f…

Read More