Would-be UK Bombers Used Social Media to Ask for Potential Targets

By Frank Griffin January 04, 2016

While art may imitate life, truth is stranger or more absurd than fiction. And at a time when just the mention of the word terrorism gets everyone on edge, the action of two would-be bombers in the U.K. begs the question, were they serious or did they just want to get caught?

As reported on the Guardian, a couple, Mohammed Rehman and his ex-wife Sana Ahmed Khan, went on Twitter and asked for recommendations on which target they should bomb to mark the tenth anniversary of the 2005 suicide attacks that took place in London.

Using his Twitter name “Silent Bomber," with the handle @InService2Godd, Rehman was looking for guidance as to which location would cause the biggest mass casualty, Westfield shopping center in west London, or the London Underground.

Fortunately for all Londoners, and the rest of humanity for that matter, the two were apprehended before they could carry out the bombing and they were given life sentences, with a minimum of 27 years for Mohammed, and a minimum of 25 years for his ex-wife Sana.

The bio on the Twitter account for Mohammed said, "Learn how to make powerful explosives from the comfort of ones' bedroom." Although the Twitter account has since been suspended, why weren’t the authorities made aware of this guy’s intention before it escalated to this level?

According to the Guardian, when he was being interviewed by the police, “He admitted making and testing explosives but denied intending to harm anyone. He claimed he had used Twitter to draw attention to himself in the hope he would be arrested and put in custody.”

That obviously worked, if you believe what he says. But the fact that he received £14,000 ($20,631) from his wife and purchased 10kg (22 lbs.) of urea nitrate to make an explosive device says otherwise. To remove any doubt of his intentions, he filmed himself detonating a small charge in his back garden.

Another curious point about Mohammed is he didn’t try to hide his identity when he was online searching for information and asking questions. Whether it was his inexperience or just luck, he didn’t use encryption applications that would have rendered all his conversation undetectable by anyone. And as the U.K. debates the use of its Snooper's Charter, which gives authorities increased surveillance capabilities, will citizens support its use or opt to kill the legislation to protect the fundamental freedoms of everyone, including the terrorist. 

Edited by Maurice Nagle

Contributing Writer

Related Articles

Mist Applies AI to Improve Wi-Fi

By: Paula Bernier    11/9/2017

Mist has created an AI-driven wireless platform that puts the user and his or mobile device at the heart of the wireless network. Combining machine le…

Read More

International Tech Innovation Growing, Says Consumer Technology Association

By: Doug Mohney    11/8/2017

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA) is best known for the world's largest trade event, but the organization's reach is growing far beyond the CE…

Read More

Broadcom Makes Unsolicited $130B Bid for Qualcomm

By: Paula Bernier    11/6/2017

In what could result in the biggest tech deal in history, semiconductor company Broadcom has made an offer to buy Qualcomm for a whopping $130 billion…

Read More

How Google's 'Moonshot' Could Benefit Industrial Markets

By: Kayla Matthews    10/30/2017

The term "moonshot" encapsulates the spirit of technological achievement: an accomplishment so ambitious, so improbable, that it's equivalent to sendi…

Read More

After Cisco/Broadsoft, Who's Next for M&A?

By: Doug Mohney    10/27/2017

Cisco's trail of acquisition tears over the decades includes the Flip video camera, Cerent, Scientific Atlantic, Linksys, and a couple of others. The …

Read More