When Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) collapsed, it became the second largest bank failure in U.S. history when New York Signature Bank’s customers began withdrawing their cash, causing the regulators to take control and shut down the bank. Fortunately, due to the rapid response from regulators, the deposit outflows from small and midsized lenders slowed, and it looks like any other major collapse has been avoided.

How did this happen?

According to Pitchbook, venture capital deal activity sank over 30% last year and a slowdown in initial public offerings and continuing drawdown in valuations signaled trouble for 2023. However, startup spending hadn’t slowed, even with the expected decline in funding.

Silicon Valley Bank had been seeing an influx in deposit accounts and a declining need for loans with total client funds having fallen for the last five quarters. With the declining need for loans, SVB needed to offset its assets with a new revenue stream and turned to government securities while the interest rates were at zero. This left the bank open to vulnerabilities, given that the government started to raise interest rates since SVB invested.

On Thursday, March 16, the CEO of SVB announced his intention to sell those government securities at a loss to offset its current assets. This spurred venture capitalists to turn to social media and other online platforms and recommend that their portfolio companies and borrowers immediately withdraw their money.

These social media conversations induced panic and fear, while providing a sense of uncertainty for all organizations that trusted the institution with their assets. The alarm of organizations withdrawing funds publicly sparked a run on the bank that SVB could not handle. Late that Friday, SVB was closed by regulators due to being insolvent.

Luckily, the U.S. government took action just days later on Sunday night, March 19, and announced that depositors will be made whole.

Over the weekend, companies that banked with SVB had to scramble to open new bank accounts and communicate with their customers and employees about the changes and potential impact. Had the regulators not acted quickly, many startups could have had to shut their doors overnight, not being able to make payroll or other recurring expenses.

In hindsight, had venture capitalists and startup founders stayed calm, this immediate collapse could have been avoided. However, that doesn’t mean that the venture and startup community is out of the woods yet.

Where do we go from here?

Venture capital exists to help startup companies that a traditional bank won’t invest in grow and scale. They prioritize tech innovation and growth along with growing the bottom line. There are higher risks, but much bigger rewards.

Silicon Valley Bank was arguably the epicenter of the financial system for the startup ecosystem because it was not only the bank for these startups, but it also provided loans to VC and private equity firms. With that said, the future is uncertain, but here are a few things to keep in mind.

Cyber startups will continue to flourish

In 2022, cyber security companies raised a total of $18.5 billion in venture capital funding, and cyber security valuations didn’t fall as radically as other industry valuations fell. It’s an indication that the area is ripe for innovation and growth.

Cyber startups should be whole even with the fall of SVB. The government did the right thing when SVB and Signature Bank failed and that was to use the FDIC insurance fund, called the Deposit Insurance Fund, whicht banks pay into to pay customers at each bank back in full. Although the cap on insured deposits is $250K, to stop panic from spreading, regulators successfully made the exception to make customers whole.

However, access to capital will continue to shrink

With a projected recession on the horizon, venture capitalists were already pulling back on new investments and concentrating on solidifying their existing portfolio. With the fall of SVB, their appetite for risk will continue to dwindle. Plus, one of their main sources of loans for venture capital is now gone.

The venture market is not going away because of what happened in the banking industry recently; however, it will be more difficult to get access to capital, at least initially, as investments are less available, and likely more expensive. 

We will see a bounce back in venture investing and likely new resources to fill the gap that SVB leaves, but the timing is uncertain. Startups need to preserve cash and closely manage their burn in an effort to extend their runway. Bridging to a larger equity raise by borrowing money from an independent debt provider could be a good resource for some strong growth companies.

The future of SVB and what it means for venture capital is still up in the air

If SVB gets absorbed by a larger bank – reportedly, First Citizens is buying the failed institution – it’s hard to say if they will be funding startups at the same rate. Some large banks will make loans to startups if those startups meet the loan criteria, usually with strong collateral.

As we have seen in the past, most software and tech companies don’t possess the collateral needed to secure traditional bank financing. Venture banks, like SVB, tend to be more nimble than the big banks. That being said, some of the largest banks – such as JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citi – have groups/bankers focused on small business, so perhaps we could see a shift in mindset where the large banks expand their appetite for risk to support emerging companies.

What should startup founders do now?

As startups try to navigate when VC investing will return to pre-2022 levels, there are things they can do to ensure their companies keep moving forward. Entrepreneurs and existing investors will need to focus on a few things to maximize their “dry powder.”

Here are the areas startups should concentrate on in the foreseeable future.

Focus your time and resources outside of VC

Understand that venture firms will be focused on the most promising companies within their existing portfolios so now is not the time to focus on raising capital from these investors.

Make the most of resources within your control.

Here are three main areas that you can control over this next period:

• Focus on customer acquisition costs. Marketing spend can be mitigated by focusing on existing customers v acquiring new.
• Be diligent with cash. Focus on bootstrapping, which can extend the runway.
• Streamline operations, including remote working to avoid office expenses where appropriate.

Leverage existing investors / relationships or focus on independent resources

Not many banks have the startup resources or mindset to support early stage companies. With that in mind, look for financing from your current investors, your cap table or bootstrapping from friends and family.

You can also identify independent resources, such as stand-alone venture debt providers who understand the inherent risks associated with early stage companies and who can partner with you to help you achieve your goals.

Hang on

We know it’s easy to let panic set in, but strong leaders shine in a time of turmoil.  Lean on your network, overcommunicate to your teams and know that this situation inevitably will shift. 

About the author: Wendy Jarchow is the Chief Investment Officer at River SaaS Capital. She leads the due diligence and lending activities and has more than 20 years of experience in finance, venture capital, and strategic planning at both large corporations and entrepreneurial ventures. River SaaS Capital provides alternative venture financing to growing B2B SaaS businesses. Wendy is a Northeast Ohio native and an alumna of John Carroll University.