Dutch Parliament Passes 'Net Neutrality' Rules

By Gary Kim June 23, 2011

Dutch mobile operators will not be able to block customers from using Skype or other web-based Internet messaging services, or charge an extra fee to use such applications, according to a new law passed by the Netherlands Parliament.

Vodafone charges customers an additional fee to use Skype on smartphones, while T-Mobile prohibits subscribers from using Skype or “WhatsApp” in its terms and conditions, and KPN said last month it wanted to introduce additional charges. The European Commission and European Parliament have endorsed “network neutrality” guidelines but as yet have taken no legal action against operators that block or impose extra fees on consumers using services like Skype, the voice and video Internet service being acquired by Microsoft, and WhatsApp, a mobile software maker which is based in Santa Clara, California.

Network neutrality is a complicated issue, despite occasional efforts to paint it as a simple matter of content freedom. The Netherlands rules are heralded as a network neutrality move. In part, they are. Most fair minded people might agree that access providers should not be able to block use of lawful apps. 

In the U.S. market, such rules prohibiting blocking of lawful apps, used in lawful ways, already are part of the Federal Communications Commission “Internet Freedoms” principles, which state, among other things, that users should be able to use all lawful applications.

There are at least two conceptually different issues involved here, and that's the complicated part. There is the issue of a user's ability to use a lawful application in a lawful way within the terms that the provider applies to broadband access services.

Then there is the separate issue of charging consumers additional amounts to use such lawful apps, within the context of a best effort service, in lawful ways, because those services compete with a carrier's own voice and messaging services. The “blocking” issue might be seen by some of us as the more important issue here. 

It has been a common practice in Europe for some time that mobile operators block or discriminate against Internet services which compete with their legacy offerings, which might be viewed more a matter of restraint of trade than a matter of content freedom. That appears to have happened in Europe. As European Commissioner Neelie Kroes said, “blocking or charging extra fees for VoIP has been reported on mobile operators in Austria, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Romania.” 

In this case the issues of content freedom and retail features are conflated, since the additional fee applies specifically to a few particular apps, and those apps could not be used, though lawful, unless the fee was paid. But the issues of freedom to use lawful apps and how retail pricing is set are not necessarily always related.

An access provider might provide other optional services or features to customers who pay for those additional services. Service providers do that all the time for business customers. Many would argue that an access provider ought to be allowed to sell various types of access for users of different apps. If real-time services are important, then consumers should have the option of buying quality of service provisions, just as business customers do.

Users should be able to buy “best effort” Internet access and other types of quality assured access. As electricity firms have peak and off-peak pricing, access providers ought to be free to use such mechanisms. Pricing by consumption or quality metrics are different ways this might be done. What access providers should not be able to do is block use of lawful apps, used in lawful ways.

The area where many people might agree is that consumers should be able to use all lawful Internet applications, in a lawful manner, so long as use of those applications is within an access providers typical terms and conditions for use of the access service generally. That means there should not be a separate fee for use of Skype or messaging applications, as a matter of course, when consumers buy services with consumption quotas or caps.

Want to learn more about the latest in communications and technology? Then be sure to attend ITEXPO West 2011, taking place Sept. 13-15, 2011, in Austin, Texas. ITEXPO offers an educational program to help corporate decision makers select the right IP-based voice, video, fax and unified communications solutions to improve their operations. It's also where service providers learn how to profitably roll out the services their subscribers are clamoring for – and where resellers can learn about new growth opportunities. To register, click here.

Gary Kim is a contributing editor for TechZone360. To read more of Gary’s articles, please visit his columnist page.

Edited by Jennifer Russell

Contributing Editor

Related Articles

Is 5G a Spectrum-eating Monster that Destroys Competition?

By: Fred Goldstein    6/15/2018

To hear the current FCC talk about it, 5G mobile service is the be-all and end-all of not only mobile communications, but the answer to most of the co…

Read More

FX Group Makes the Red Carpet Shoppable with Blockchain-Based mCart Marketplace-as-a-Service

By: TMCnet News    6/14/2018

mCart by Mavatar announces the launch of the world's first blockchain-based decentralized mCart marketplace by the FX Group.

Read More

Judge Gives AT&T-Time Warner Deal Green Light

By: Paula Bernier    6/12/2018

Federal judge Richard Leon gave the $85 billion deal the green light today - and without any requirements to sell off any parts of the company. He als…

Read More

A New Foundation for Evolving Blockchain As a Fundamental Network Technology

By: Arti Loftus    6/12/2018

There are now thousands of blockchains, and unless you are a cryptophile, you won't recognize most of them.

Read More