With all of the hubbub about whether personal devices, smartphones and tablets, are good platforms for advertising —including the perception that they are not, which helped drop the Facebook IPO valuation in the days after it was issued, since more people are accessing the popular social media site from their mobiles — it is nice to actually have some data on the subject. That is precisely what the Interactive Advertising Bureau (IAB) and it Mobile Marketing Center of Excellence has provided with the recently released report “Mobile’s Role in the Consumer’s Media Day.” It is an eye-opener.
Not so bad
Done for IAB by research firm ABI Research, findings are based on a survey that had a sample balanced at 50 percent males and 50 percent females in the U.S. It was aimed delineated by age groups and included responses from 552 U.S. consumers, who use a smartphone at least once a week and use data service, and 563 U.S. tablet users, who also are on their devices at least once a week and utilize data service as well.
Highlights of the report are illuminating:
Anna Bager, VP and GM, Mobile Marketing Center of Excellence, IAB in commenting on the study stated, “Both tablet and smartphone users show an impressive interest in mobile advertising…The key for marketers is looking at how consumers use these devices in different ways, and tailoring brand messages and strategies accordingly.”
The study also included some additional insights into how people relate to their devices. For example:
It gets even more interesting. People with both devices demonstrated the differentiated value derived from using each platform.
Not very surprising was that respondents with both said that they preferred to consume traditional media like print and video on tablets (69 percent print, 68 percent video) over a smartphone (9 percent print, 8 percent video). This should send a strong message not just to advertisers, but to content providers up and down the value chain.
The study also found that time of day matters. For smartphone users, the three most impactful media moments of the day are:
In other words, despite all of the current analysis that says we are not good at multi-tasking, reality (and this may not be good news for advertisers on TV) is that not only do we multi-task, but the presumption is that concentration and engagement is likely in the palm of our hands.
It was noted that tablet user behavior was a bit harder to generalize about, although 28 percent said they were using their tablets to engage social media first thing in the morning. This leads to the question of how many were looking at their smartphones instead.
Last but not least was the question of where one engages with ads. The study found that nearly one-third of mobile device owners (30 percent smartphone users, 32 percent tablet users) said they were likely to respond to ads that related to their current location. The report was careful to note that “current locations” included being at home. This was amplified by the findings that 48 percent of smartphone users and 59 percent of tablet users say they regularly conduct local searches on their mobile devices while at home in front of the television set.
Rethinking advertising platforms
The IAB study makes for interesting food for thought, especially when you get into the weeds on the generational differences. The good news here is that despite what many observers have thought, personal devices can engage users with advertising in remarkably high numbers, especially tablets whose bigger screens provide a more digestible user experience. Tablets, because they are used as entertainment hubs, also naturally have people in a context modality that is similar to the TV experience, i.e., a context where ads are expected.
The more provocative question raised by the study is what marketers need to do in calibrating their ad spends as the personal device population continues its explosion. If tablets have high engagement and are used extensively while people are “watching television” it is hard to imagine that there will not be pushback when broadcasters and cable operators ask for an increase on their ad rates. After all there is not just the engagement issue, but a distraction one as well that must be considered.
Famed futurist, Marshall McLuhan said decades ago that, “The medium is the message.” He got it right. The result is that deciphering the preferred medium for a major marketing spend (and I include the device as a medium here) that is best for engaging highly desired audiences — those with enough discretionary income to have multiple devices and wireless and wired broadband connections — is key. With television increasingly becoming the background noise for what we do with our “leisure time”, and DVRs and streamed video making it easy to skip ads, there is marketing industry disruption in the air. Should be fascinating to see what all of this means not just marketers but also for Google, Facebook, Twitter et al.
As international aid agencies and NGOs gear up to help the victims of the 7.8-magnitude earthquake that struck Nepal on Saturday, claiming more than 3…
Perception can become reality, and this is not necessarily good news. This is particularly true during times of major change, which we are currently e…
Comcast may have called off its $45 billion megamerger with Time Warner Cable, but the legacy of what that means for the FCC's policy for online video…
The solar industry has been of particular interest to consumers, businesses, and technology developers over the course of the past decade or so. Solar…
Silver was the primary mineral mined in Nevada when it was admitted to the union in 1864, earning it the slogan of "The Silver State." Times changed, …