The Government's Conspiracy Theories about Apple Revealed

By Nicole Spector May 20, 2013

On June 3, the case of United States of America vs. Apple Inc. goes to trial.

In anticipation of the landmark proceedings, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) has released its pretrial filings, Melville House reports.

The filings show that the DOJ accuses Apple of being the “ringmaster” of a wide-ranging conspiracy.

Wait, the government gets to wield conspiracy theories, too? Plot twist!

In the filings, the DOJ says perfectly Michael Moore-ish things like, “Apple knew exactly what it was doing.”

The DOJ filings include private e-mails between Big Six executives and the late Steve Jobs himself. The e-mails figure as evidence in the argument that Apple sought to coordinate with Hachette, Harper Collins, Macmillan, Simon & Schuster and Penguin to set e-book prices above $9.99, because “Apple knew that the major publishers disliked Amazon’s low prices and saw Apple’s potential entry as a pathway to higher retail prices industry-wide.”

Unaddressed are Amazon’s exploitative e-book pricing practices—though there is plenty of evidence of that in these e-mails. It would seem the government has a clear target in mind, and is – ahem – aiming for the Apple.

Apple released its own filings, as explored by Publishers Weekly.

In its filing, Apple disputes the charges, maintaining that despite the heaps of documents and sworn testimony, there is no “direct evidence” of any conspiracy.

“The evidentiary record the parties submitted proves that Apple did not conspire with any publisher to raise prices in the e-book industry,” Apple attorneys state. “Plaintiffs cherry-pick quotes taken out of context and repackage them to tell a false narrative.”

Penguin, also being singled out by the DOJ for bad behavior, has also released filings, where it accuses the plaintiffs of “misconstruing” events.

“The plaintiffs cannot extrapolate direct evidence of a conspiracy from the fact that Penguin received vertical assurances from Apple,” Penguin attorneys argue. “Penguin did not care what business model anybody else used with Apple.”

Edited by Alisen Downey

Contributing Writer

Related Articles

Why Blockchain Could Be a Gamechanger

By: Paula Bernier    1/22/2018

Blockchain has become closely associated with the controversial topic of cryptocurrency. And that's fine because blockchain is an enabling technology …

Read More

Consumer Privacy in the Digital Era: Three Trends to Watch

By: Special Guest    1/18/2018

Digital advertising has exploded in recent years, with the latest eMarketer data forecasting $83 billion in revenue this year and continued growth on …

Read More

CES 2018: Terabit Fiber - Closer Than We Think

By: Doug Mohney    1/17/2018

One of the biggest challenges for 5G and last mile 10 Gig deployments is not raw data speeds, but middle mile and core networks. The wireless industry…

Read More

10 Benefits of Drone-Based Asset Inspections

By: Frank Segarra    1/15/2018

Although a new and emerging technology, (which is still evolving), in early 2018, most companies are not aware of the possible benefits they can achie…

Read More

VR Could Change Entertainment Forever

By: Special Guest    1/11/2018

VR could change everything from how we play video games to how we interact with our friends and family. VR has the power to change how we consume all …

Read More