FCC to Tackle PSTN Shutdown Issues

By Gary Kim November 20, 2013

Nothing ever is really easy for communications regulators when it comes to crafting rules that promote both competition and investment, as well as “fair” policies when industries collide or a major transition has to be made from older technologies to newer technologies.

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission therefore will not face a politically easy task when it once again engages in December 2013, with the process of speeding the transition from legacy time division multiplex networks to Internet Protocol networks.

The transition includes other elements, such as the transition from copper access to fiber and other forms of access, the rules that should apply to legacy services in the transition and whether the new networks also require different policy frameworks.

The FCC’s Technology Transitions Policy Task Force will present a status update in December, with the expectation that an order for immediate action will be considered. That means the FCC will ask for further input on what experiments need to be conducted on how IP networks can, and should work.

The order also will ask for input on processes the FCC can use to guide the shutdown of the older public network and the activation of new IP networks.

Recently, for example, there has been friction between buyers of special access services and sellers of such services. But disputes over special access rates and terms of service have been contentious for some time.

Buyers of special access services frequently have complained about high prices for special access. In 2012, the FCC suspended pricing freedom rules for special access services, because of such friction.

Most recently, AT&T changed its multi-year contract rates, in anticipation of a complete phase out of special access services, in favor of Ethernet only high-bandwidth services.

That illustrates the many practical considerations the FCC will face as it plans for a shutdown of the older network and the substitution of an all-IP network.

Many bigger issues will have to be confronted, though, including such issues as the extent of common carrier rules in an environment where some telcos, but not other service providers, must comply with such rules.

Those rules will necessarily affect policy about investment in rural and hard-to-serve areas, for example.

Edited by Cassandra Tucker

Contributing Editor

Related Articles

Is 5G a Spectrum-eating Monster that Destroys Competition?

By: Fred Goldstein    6/15/2018

To hear the current FCC talk about it, 5G mobile service is the be-all and end-all of not only mobile communications, but the answer to most of the co…

Read More

FX Group Makes the Red Carpet Shoppable with Blockchain-Based mCart Marketplace-as-a-Service

By: TMCnet News    6/14/2018

mCart by Mavatar announces the launch of the world's first blockchain-based decentralized mCart marketplace by the FX Group.

Read More

Judge Gives AT&T-Time Warner Deal Green Light

By: Paula Bernier    6/12/2018

Federal judge Richard Leon gave the $85 billion deal the green light today - and without any requirements to sell off any parts of the company. He als…

Read More

A New Foundation for Evolving Blockchain As a Fundamental Network Technology

By: Arti Loftus    6/12/2018

There are now thousands of blockchains, and unless you are a cryptophile, you won't recognize most of them.

Read More