Telstra Exits Hong Kong Market

By Gary Kim December 20, 2013

Sometimes the interplay between regulatory decisions and business strategy is subtle; sometimes not.

When antitrust authorities prevented AT&T from buying T-Mobile USA, the impact is rather direct, deflecting  AT&T from a domestic growth strategy and implicitly forcing AT&T to look outside the United States for growth.

In Hong Kong, regulators have chosen to take back significant chunks of 3G spectrum and re-auction them, a move that is expected to have the primary impact of enabling China Mobile to acquire its own spectrum in the Hong Kong market.

At other times, market share issues or changes in the level of competition can prompt service providers to respond indirectly to regulator policies. So it is that Telstra is selling its Hong Kong mobile business to HKT, a move that is at least indirectly due to decisions by Hong Kong regulatory authorities to increase the amount of competition in the Hong Kong market.

Hong Kong Communications Authority regulators are taking back 33 percent of the 3G spectrum held by the four current providers, to auction again.

But even HKT is responding to possible regulatory concerns by pledging not to bid for spectrum in the upcoming auction, a step that limits HKT’s competitive position.

Separately, Telstra earlier had decided to exit the Australian landline communications business, selling its assets to the National Broadband Network, the new government-sponsored wholesale broadband access provider in Australia, after unsuccessfully fighting for years to prevent NBN from coming into being.

By surrendering its fixed network, and keeping its domestic mobile assets, Telstra explicitly made Telstra a mobile provider in Australia, and so far, elsewhere in Asia, where Telstra is seeking revenue growth.

The point is that whether regulatory decisions are direct, such as blocking a proposed acquisition or merger, or indirect, such as encouraging contestants to enter or exit markets, regulatory policy shapes communication markets.

As always, for every public purpose, there is a corresponding private interest. So regulatory policies always create winners and losers.

When the Federal Communications Commission allows Dish Network to use its former mobile satellite spectrum to provide Long Term Evolution services, it created equity value worth perhaps $9 billion, just in spectrum rights.

Telstra is leaving the Hong Kong market as a more or less direct response to changes in regulatory policy.




Edited by Cassandra Tucker

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Why Blockchain Could Be a Gamechanger

By: Paula Bernier    1/22/2018

Blockchain has become closely associated with the controversial topic of cryptocurrency. And that's fine because blockchain is an enabling technology …

Read More

Consumer Privacy in the Digital Era: Three Trends to Watch

By: Special Guest    1/18/2018

Digital advertising has exploded in recent years, with the latest eMarketer data forecasting $83 billion in revenue this year and continued growth on …

Read More

CES 2018: Terabit Fiber - Closer Than We Think

By: Doug Mohney    1/17/2018

One of the biggest challenges for 5G and last mile 10 Gig deployments is not raw data speeds, but middle mile and core networks. The wireless industry…

Read More

10 Benefits of Drone-Based Asset Inspections

By: Frank Segarra    1/15/2018

Although a new and emerging technology, (which is still evolving), in early 2018, most companies are not aware of the possible benefits they can achie…

Read More

VR Could Change Entertainment Forever

By: Special Guest    1/11/2018

VR could change everything from how we play video games to how we interact with our friends and family. VR has the power to change how we consume all …

Read More