Telstra Exits Hong Kong Market

By Gary Kim December 20, 2013

Sometimes the interplay between regulatory decisions and business strategy is subtle; sometimes not.

When antitrust authorities prevented AT&T from buying T-Mobile USA, the impact is rather direct, deflecting  AT&T from a domestic growth strategy and implicitly forcing AT&T to look outside the United States for growth.

In Hong Kong, regulators have chosen to take back significant chunks of 3G spectrum and re-auction them, a move that is expected to have the primary impact of enabling China Mobile to acquire its own spectrum in the Hong Kong market.

At other times, market share issues or changes in the level of competition can prompt service providers to respond indirectly to regulator policies. So it is that Telstra is selling its Hong Kong mobile business to HKT, a move that is at least indirectly due to decisions by Hong Kong regulatory authorities to increase the amount of competition in the Hong Kong market.

Hong Kong Communications Authority regulators are taking back 33 percent of the 3G spectrum held by the four current providers, to auction again.

But even HKT is responding to possible regulatory concerns by pledging not to bid for spectrum in the upcoming auction, a step that limits HKT’s competitive position.

Separately, Telstra earlier had decided to exit the Australian landline communications business, selling its assets to the National Broadband Network, the new government-sponsored wholesale broadband access provider in Australia, after unsuccessfully fighting for years to prevent NBN from coming into being.

By surrendering its fixed network, and keeping its domestic mobile assets, Telstra explicitly made Telstra a mobile provider in Australia, and so far, elsewhere in Asia, where Telstra is seeking revenue growth.

The point is that whether regulatory decisions are direct, such as blocking a proposed acquisition or merger, or indirect, such as encouraging contestants to enter or exit markets, regulatory policy shapes communication markets.

As always, for every public purpose, there is a corresponding private interest. So regulatory policies always create winners and losers.

When the Federal Communications Commission allows Dish Network to use its former mobile satellite spectrum to provide Long Term Evolution services, it created equity value worth perhaps $9 billion, just in spectrum rights.

Telstra is leaving the Hong Kong market as a more or less direct response to changes in regulatory policy.




Edited by Cassandra Tucker

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Why People Don't Update Their Computers

By: Special Guest    7/13/2018

When the WannaCry ransomware attacked companies all over the world in 2017, experts soon realized it was meant to be stopped by regular updating. Even…

Read More

More Intelligence About The New Intelligence

By: Rich Tehrani    7/9/2018

TMC recently announced the launch of three new artificial intelligence events under the banner of The New Intelligence. I recently spoke with TMC's Ex…

Read More

Technology, Innovation, and Compliance: How Businesses Approach the Digital Age

By: Special Guest    6/29/2018

Organizations must align internally to achieve effective innovation. Companies should consider creating cross-functional teams or, at a minimum, incre…

Read More

Contribute Your Brain Power to The New Intelligence

By: Paula Bernier    6/28/2018

The three events that are part of The New Intelligence are all about how businesses and service providers, and their customers, can benefit from artif…

Read More

TMC Launches The New Intelligence - an Unparalleled AI and Machine Learning Conference & Expo in Florida

By: TMCnet News    6/28/2018

TMC announced the launch of The New Intelligence conference and expo - The Event Powering the AI Revolution. This exciting new event will take place o…

Read More