Cox vs. Verizon - No Real Comparison

By

Over the past decade, I've been able to watch how two different communications providers conduct operations in the Northern Virginia area. Cox Communication and Verizon both deliver dial tone services to my house, while Cox has been my selection for broadband. Two traits set them apart: Customer service and proactive maintenance.

Over the past decade, I've had to deal with Verizon twice on simple dial tone issues.  The first time, I had to move phone numbers almost literally across the street, in the same zip code, same central office, to a known working copper dial tone in transfer. Verizon needed a technician to come over and "install" the "new" phone line, so I sat around for eight hours waiting. Nobody came, nobody called.

After talking to two different dispatch people, I finally got a hold of a supervisor, who said there had been an order mistake in the system, and sorry, but we can't get anyone out there for another two weeks. After much cajoling, I managed to convince the supervisor to switch one line over without dispatching a technician.

Cox came out a month later to move the second phone line over from Verizon service. The company gave me a two hour service window, showed up on time, and took about an hour in total to install new hardware—this was back in the days when Cox was using dedicated gear for dial-tone, connecting directly to the household wiring.   

Dial tone is one of the basic services of any communications company. Cox delivered a tech within three days of the call and the techs moved the phone number from one network to another in an hour, where Verizon had blown the first service call and spent a week before scheduling someone out on the follow-up.

A couple years later, the dial tone on the Verizon line went out. I filed a service call on Monday, was told that it would take up to five days to have a tech out to fix it. By Friday morning, I was at wit's end and filed an on-line complaint with the Virginia regulators. Verizon had techs on site by 2 PM, a patch in by 4 PM and someone on Sunday to pull new wire. Because the issue was flagged by Virginia regulators, Verizon pulled out the stops to get the problem resolved and off the state watch list.

Shortly thereafter, our neighborhood became the target of Verizon FiOS promotions. Advertising implied FiOS would be more reliable than copper, but what Verizon didn't say is that the company still would take five to seven days to send out a technician if something goes wrong, as compared to the next day  and two hour window offered in a Cox repair call.

Proactive maintenance is something that I've never seen before from any communications provider. I recently upgraded to Cox's Contour DVR/on-demand package. During the installation, the technician scheduled a replacement for my older coaxial cable. I would have preferred to get fiber, but still, it's the concept that counts. Putting in the new cable proactively means Cox gets rid of potential future problems and doesn't leave the customer waiting for a day without service.  

Verizon's approach to its consumers seems to be "If you order FiOS, we'll give it to you. But you have to order it. Otherwise, your copper will break and you're stuck until we get out there to fix the copper and convince you to move to fiber."  Presumably there are regulatory reasons to this passive-aggressive approach, but it doesn't fix the fact that Verizon has a wait-until-it-dies philosophy to its existing copper plant.




Edited by Maurice Nagle
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

3 Factors That Can Dramatically Impact Your Microsoft Intune Spend

By: Contributing Writer    10/13/2026

With remote and dispersed work here to stay for the long term, secure endpoint management has become a big headache for IT and cybersecurity teams. Th…

Read More

Why Threat Modeling Fails Without an Attacker's Perspective

By: Contributing Writer    10/13/2026

A security team might spend weeks mapping attack paths and planning defenses, only to be breached through a web application nobody remembered was stil…

Read More

From AI Experiment to Enterprise Strategy: Making Claude Work at Scale

By: Contributing Writer    10/12/2026

Artificial intelligence often enters an organization through experimentation. One employee discovers a useful prompt, another tests document analysis,…

Read More

SIEM needs exposure context to keep pace with AI-era threats

By: Contributing Writer    10/6/2026

Security information and event management (SIEM) platforms give security operations center (SOC) teams a central place to collect and analyze security…

Read More

Why Your Business Needs Claude Security

By: Contributing Writer    8/26/2026

Mid-market businesses adopting generative artificial intelligence platforms like Claude face a significant challenge. While these tools can boost prod…

Read More