Kaspersky: Three Out of Four Users Have Trouble Spotting Big Threats

By Steve Anderson November 23, 2015

We all know that spending on cybersecurity has been on the rise lately, as everyone from major corporations to military groups ramp up their cyberdefenses. A new study from Kaspersky Lab suggests this could be a good idea, as regular users don't fare so well in spotting some potentially major cyber-threats.

The Kaspersky Lab study was simple enough in nature, asking users to download a copy of The Beatles' hit “Yesterday.” Twenty six percent of respondents went with the “safe” option of a .wma file, while the rest proceeded in less-than-secure directions. Better than a third—34 percent—of users turned to an .exe file, which went under the filename “Beatles_Yesterday.mp3.exe”. Another 14 percent turned to a .scr file, while 26 percent used a .zip option. The problem here is that each of these three file types has the potential to contain malicious content.

For other types of files and media, the situation didn't improve. Twenty-one percent of users turn to several different online sources for downloading files, which increases the odds of hitting malicious content. Just 24 percent could recognize a genuine webpage as presented against phishing options, and when presented with several options for sites on which to enter data, 58 percent were prepared to input data into a fake.

Image via Pixabay

Kaspersky Lab principal security researcher David Emm compares some parts of the Web to a “dodgy bar” where users wouldn't normally flash their cash, and recommended similar user response. Even Emm, however, acknowledges that this is somewhat futile; cyber-criminals are constantly at work to develop new threats, and what may not look like a threat today may be the most obvious sign of all in a week.

It's easy to mock people for being less than computer-savvy, but when even one of Kaspersky's biggest researchers is noting that anything an average user learns today could be rendered largely invalid by developing events, trying to pin the blame on users here is a tougher sell. Sure, it's seldom a good idea to download .exe files, but many of our standard apps start with these files. Could anyone ever use Mozilla Firefox without downloading an .exe? Some protections are too simple to pass up, however, like looking for the S in https addresses or similar matters. 




Edited by Kyle Piscioniere

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

How Valuable is Your Personal Data?

By: Special Guest    9/25/2017

Pressure has been growing in the past few weeks for politicians and regulators to clamp down on the monopoly power of Big Tech. Indeed, scrutiny is gr…

Read More

How valuable is your personal data?

By: Special Guest    9/22/2017

Are you unknowingly working for someone else and is Big Tech making vast gains at our expense?

Read More

Designing Insightful Dashboards for Decision Making

By: Special Guest    9/21/2017

As businesses continue to accumulate data that has the potential to improve operations and increase revenue, dashboard design is becoming a key compon…

Read More

Artificial Intelligence: The Human to Bot Handoff

By: Special Guest    9/21/2017

Artificial intelligence (AI) is one of the most talked about and debated topics of conversation happening today. It is touching every industry.

Read More

Dark Data - Do You Have a Plan?

By: Special Guest    9/19/2017

Practically every organization has vast amounts of "dark data" in the form of weblogs, machine logs, and logs from sensors on everything from oil rigs…

Read More