Kaspersky: Three Out of Four Users Have Trouble Spotting Big Threats

By Steve Anderson November 23, 2015

We all know that spending on cybersecurity has been on the rise lately, as everyone from major corporations to military groups ramp up their cyberdefenses. A new study from Kaspersky Lab suggests this could be a good idea, as regular users don't fare so well in spotting some potentially major cyber-threats.

The Kaspersky Lab study was simple enough in nature, asking users to download a copy of The Beatles' hit “Yesterday.” Twenty six percent of respondents went with the “safe” option of a .wma file, while the rest proceeded in less-than-secure directions. Better than a third—34 percent—of users turned to an .exe file, which went under the filename “Beatles_Yesterday.mp3.exe”. Another 14 percent turned to a .scr file, while 26 percent used a .zip option. The problem here is that each of these three file types has the potential to contain malicious content.

For other types of files and media, the situation didn't improve. Twenty-one percent of users turn to several different online sources for downloading files, which increases the odds of hitting malicious content. Just 24 percent could recognize a genuine webpage as presented against phishing options, and when presented with several options for sites on which to enter data, 58 percent were prepared to input data into a fake.

Image via Pixabay

Kaspersky Lab principal security researcher David Emm compares some parts of the Web to a “dodgy bar” where users wouldn't normally flash their cash, and recommended similar user response. Even Emm, however, acknowledges that this is somewhat futile; cyber-criminals are constantly at work to develop new threats, and what may not look like a threat today may be the most obvious sign of all in a week.

It's easy to mock people for being less than computer-savvy, but when even one of Kaspersky's biggest researchers is noting that anything an average user learns today could be rendered largely invalid by developing events, trying to pin the blame on users here is a tougher sell. Sure, it's seldom a good idea to download .exe files, but many of our standard apps start with these files. Could anyone ever use Mozilla Firefox without downloading an .exe? Some protections are too simple to pass up, however, like looking for the S in https addresses or similar matters. 




Edited by Kyle Piscioniere

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Mist Applies AI to Improve Wi-Fi

By: Paula Bernier    11/9/2017

Mist has created an AI-driven wireless platform that puts the user and his or mobile device at the heart of the wireless network. Combining machine le…

Read More

International Tech Innovation Growing, Says Consumer Technology Association

By: Doug Mohney    11/8/2017

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA) is best known for the world's largest trade event, but the organization's reach is growing far beyond the CE…

Read More

Broadcom Makes Unsolicited $130B Bid for Qualcomm

By: Paula Bernier    11/6/2017

In what could result in the biggest tech deal in history, semiconductor company Broadcom has made an offer to buy Qualcomm for a whopping $130 billion…

Read More

How Google's 'Moonshot' Could Benefit Industrial Markets

By: Kayla Matthews    10/30/2017

The term "moonshot" encapsulates the spirit of technological achievement: an accomplishment so ambitious, so improbable, that it's equivalent to sendi…

Read More

After Cisco/Broadsoft, Who's Next for M&A?

By: Doug Mohney    10/27/2017

Cisco's trail of acquisition tears over the decades includes the Flip video camera, Cerent, Scientific Atlantic, Linksys, and a couple of others. The …

Read More