Fun with Numbers: 'Adjusted' Dot-Bomb Financials Return to Wall St.

By John Casaretto December 18, 2015

They say history repeats itself, but the signs coming out of Wall St. are reminding analysts of a history many don’t want to repeat. Adjusted financial reporting is making a comeback as hundreds of companies in the United States have resorted to financial shell games in their corporate earnings reports. By using these numbers, companies are able to present improved statistics in the form of 'adjusted' net income, 'adjusted' sales, and 'adjusted Ebitda'. The changes have allowed some companies to create the illusion of double digit improvements.

One undisclosed company is using adjusted metrics internally to evaluate management and compare its performance to rivals. The rules are complex, but these kinds of reports often fly in the face of securities regulations, making this an interesting dance for companies to venture into.

According to reports, one out of every ten major securities filings made this year used the term adjusted Ebidta, which represent adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The number of companies using this metric is rising, too. Only one out of forty companies used these methods a decade ago. In fact, about 25 percent of the filings this past year used figures that didn't comply with generally accepted accounting principles. 

Whether this renaissance of unusual accounting methods is the product of evolving accounting community practices, corporate pressure, or an indicator of something darker, people are starting to notice. The adjusted financial terms have been seen in securities filings, quarterly earnings releases, as well as standard financial reports. Ultimately, Wall St. and investors are left to decide whether these practices are something they are willing to accept or whether it is something that reminds of a financial disaster of the technology era. These kinds of financial shell games are nothing new, but there is an explicit danger should they become largely accepted or ignored. In any case, they introduce confusion into an already complicated market and make analysis that much more difficult. 




Edited by Kyle Piscioniere

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Four Reasons to Reach for the Cloud after World Earth Day

By: Special Guest    4/23/2018

The World Earth Day agenda offers a chance to flip the rationale for cloud adoption and highlight environmental benefits that the technology brings pr…

Read More

Bloomberg BETA: Models Are Key to Machine Intelligence

By: Paula Bernier    4/19/2018

James Cham, partner at seed fund Bloomberg BETA, was at Cisco Collaboration Summit today talking about the importance of models to the future of machi…

Read More

Get Smart About Influencer Attribution in a Blockchain World

By: Maurice Nagle    4/16/2018

The retail value chain is in for a blockchain-enabled overhaul, with smarter relationships, delivering enhanced transparency across an environment of …

Read More

Facebook Flip-Flopping on GDPR

By: Maurice Nagle    4/12/2018

With GDPR on the horizon, Zuckerberg in Congress testifying and Facebook users questioning loyalty, change is coming. What that change will look like,…

Read More

The Next Phase of Flash Storage and the Mid-Sized Business

By: Joanna Fanuko    4/11/2018

Organizations amass profuse amounts of data these days, ranging from website traffic metrics to online customer surveys. Collectively, AI, IoT and eve…

Read More