Fun with Numbers: 'Adjusted' Dot-Bomb Financials Return to Wall St.

By John Casaretto December 18, 2015

They say history repeats itself, but the signs coming out of Wall St. are reminding analysts of a history many don’t want to repeat. Adjusted financial reporting is making a comeback as hundreds of companies in the United States have resorted to financial shell games in their corporate earnings reports. By using these numbers, companies are able to present improved statistics in the form of 'adjusted' net income, 'adjusted' sales, and 'adjusted Ebitda'. The changes have allowed some companies to create the illusion of double digit improvements.

One undisclosed company is using adjusted metrics internally to evaluate management and compare its performance to rivals. The rules are complex, but these kinds of reports often fly in the face of securities regulations, making this an interesting dance for companies to venture into.

According to reports, one out of every ten major securities filings made this year used the term adjusted Ebidta, which represent adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The number of companies using this metric is rising, too. Only one out of forty companies used these methods a decade ago. In fact, about 25 percent of the filings this past year used figures that didn't comply with generally accepted accounting principles. 

Whether this renaissance of unusual accounting methods is the product of evolving accounting community practices, corporate pressure, or an indicator of something darker, people are starting to notice. The adjusted financial terms have been seen in securities filings, quarterly earnings releases, as well as standard financial reports. Ultimately, Wall St. and investors are left to decide whether these practices are something they are willing to accept or whether it is something that reminds of a financial disaster of the technology era. These kinds of financial shell games are nothing new, but there is an explicit danger should they become largely accepted or ignored. In any case, they introduce confusion into an already complicated market and make analysis that much more difficult. 

Edited by Kyle Piscioniere

Contributing Writer

Related Articles

Mist Applies AI to Improve Wi-Fi

By: Paula Bernier    11/9/2017

Mist has created an AI-driven wireless platform that puts the user and his or mobile device at the heart of the wireless network. Combining machine le…

Read More

International Tech Innovation Growing, Says Consumer Technology Association

By: Doug Mohney    11/8/2017

The Consumer Technology Association (CTA) is best known for the world's largest trade event, but the organization's reach is growing far beyond the CE…

Read More

Broadcom Makes Unsolicited $130B Bid for Qualcomm

By: Paula Bernier    11/6/2017

In what could result in the biggest tech deal in history, semiconductor company Broadcom has made an offer to buy Qualcomm for a whopping $130 billion…

Read More

How Google's 'Moonshot' Could Benefit Industrial Markets

By: Kayla Matthews    10/30/2017

The term "moonshot" encapsulates the spirit of technological achievement: an accomplishment so ambitious, so improbable, that it's equivalent to sendi…

Read More

After Cisco/Broadsoft, Who's Next for M&A?

By: Doug Mohney    10/27/2017

Cisco's trail of acquisition tears over the decades includes the Flip video camera, Cerent, Scientific Atlantic, Linksys, and a couple of others. The …

Read More