Court to Reconsider Microsoft Verdict

By Cindy Waxer November 29, 2010

Microsoft is banking on the Supreme Court to reverse a multi-million-dollar judgment against the technology giant. The court has agreed to hear an appeal from Microsoft regarding an ongoing dispute between the company and Toronto-based i4i.

In a no-holds-barred David and Goliath battle, i4i, a tiny software manufacturer, won a $290 million court judgment against Microsoft in August 2009. At the time, a Texas jury ordered Microsoft to pay $290 million in damages and stop selling Word in the U.S. for violating an i4i patent that encompasses features found in Word 2003 and Word 2007.

"We are disappointed by the court’s ruling," said Kevin Kutz, Microsoft's director of public affairs. "We believe the evidence clearly demonstrated that we do not infringe and that the i4i patent is invalid. We will appeal the verdict."

Although Microsoft did in fact appeal that decision, a federal appeals court upheld the judgment in December, issuing an injunction that prevents Microsoft from selling versions of Word that contain the patent technology now in dispute. The court's ruling took effect on Jan. 11, 2010.

Now Microsoft is fighting back and for good reason: Microsoft Word is an integral part of Microsoft Office. The Supreme Court will hear the case sometime next year.

Still, Microsoft has seen both sides of patent dispute warfare. In early October, the Redmond giant launched a suit against Motorola for infringing on its patents related to “synchronizing e-mail, calendars and contacts, scheduling meetings, and notifying applications of changes in signal strength and battery power” with its Android-based smartphones.

Motorola has also thrown its hat into the patent dispute ring. In October, a jury in Texas ordered Apple to pay a staggering $625.5 million for violating three patents owned by Mirror Words, a firm founded by David Gelernter, a Yale University computer science professor. Apple is challenging the verdict from a federal court in Tyler, Texas, saying the court has not yet looked at some of its counterclaims.




Edited by Tammy Wolf

TechZone360 Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Get Smart About Influencer Attribution in a Blockchain World

By: Maurice Nagle    4/16/2018

The retail value chain is in for a blockchain-enabled overhaul, with smarter relationships, delivering enhanced transparency across an environment of …

Read More

Facebook Flip-Flopping on GDPR

By: Maurice Nagle    4/12/2018

With GDPR on the horizon, Zuckerberg in Congress testifying and Facebook users questioning loyalty, change is coming. What that change will look like,…

Read More

The Next Phase of Flash Storage and the Mid-Sized Business

By: Joanna Fanuko    4/11/2018

Organizations amass profuse amounts of data these days, ranging from website traffic metrics to online customer surveys. Collectively, AI, IoT and eve…

Read More

Satellite Imaging - Petabytes of Developer, Business Opportunities

By: Doug Mohney    4/11/2018

Hollywood has programmed society into believing satellite imaging as a magic, all-seeing tool, but the real trick is in analysis. Numerous firms are f…

Read More

Blockchain in Space

By: Doug Mohney    4/10/2018

The fact is that everyone is putting a special spin upon blockchain this minute. Given that, it's no surprise a number of companies are discussing dis…

Read More