French Publishers Sue Google for Illegal Book Scanning

By

Three major French publishers are suing Google for scanning thousands of books to its digital library without proper permission.

Publishers Gallimard, Flammarion and Albin Michel filed suit against the Web giant on May 6 for trademark violations stemming from the unauthorized scanning of 9,797 books. That number does not include titles that were scanned since the lawsuit was filed nor those owned by the publishers' subsidiaries, according to TheBookSeller.com.

The three publishing houses are seeking approximately $14 million in damages for "a fixed tariff of 1,000 euros per scanned book to which the publishers own the rights," a legal representative close to the matter told the AFP.

Google has denied any wrongdoing, noting that its Google Books initiative is in compliance with all domestic and international copyright regulations.

"We were surprised to receive this new claim... We remain convinced of the legality of Google Books," a company representative said in a statement. "We are committed to continue working with publishers to help them develop their digital offering and to make their works accessible to Internet users in France and abroad."

The lawsuit comes only six months after France's largest publisher, Hachette Livre, came to an accord with Google to allow the Internet firm to scan its out-of-print French books.

The 1,000 euros per title is in line with a similar Dec. 2009 lawsuit filed by another French publisher, La Martiniere. A Paris court found that Google violated the nation's copyright laws with its digital library project and awarded damages. The case is currently in appeal.

Google is no stranger to the court room, having been taken there several times just this year. The search engine giant is currently embroiled in a number of legal battles, including a recent suit in California that accuses Google and several other major tech firms of violating antitrust laws by conspiring to fix employee pay, as well as plotting to create “no solicitation” agreements with one another to prevent employee poaching.

The California tech company was also on Capitol Hill on Tuesday to answer questions about privacy issues related to smartphone use.


Beecher Tuttle is a TechZone360 contributor. He has extensive experience writing and editing for print publications and online news websites. He has specialized in a variety of industries, including health care technology, politics and education. To read more of his articles, please visit his columnist page.



Edited by Rich Steeves
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

TechZone360 Contributor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Why More Leads Won't Fix a Broken Lead Management Process

By: Contributing Writer    6/23/2026

When sales results start to stall, many organizations immediately look to the top of the funnel for answers. The assumption is simple: if revenue i…

Read More

Your Post-Quantum Readiness Starts at Y2Q Summit

By: TMCnet News    5/27/2026

Y2Q Summit is an executive conference focused on helping enterprises prepare for the coming era of quantum computing disruption, cybersecurity transfo…

Read More

Why Award Marketing Should Be Part of Every B2B Tech Company's Growth Strategy

By: Erik Linask    5/20/2026

Award marketing matters for B2B tech companies because industry recognition can strengthen trust, support sales and partner relationships, improve con…

Read More

Why Email Is Still the Most Underrated Layer of Modern Software Infrastructure

By: Contributing Writer    5/15/2026

Take, for example, the following scenario. A user requests a password reset, waits a few seconds, refreshes their inbox and nothing arrives. They try …

Read More

Jitterbit's Visionary Status Signals a Shift in the iPaaS Market

By: Contributing Writer    4/7/2026

As enterprise ecosystems grow more complex, integration has become less of a backend IT function and more of a strategic driver of business performanc…

Read More