French Publishers Sue Google for Illegal Book Scanning

By

Three major French publishers are suing Google for scanning thousands of books to its digital library without proper permission.

Publishers Gallimard, Flammarion and Albin Michel filed suit against the Web giant on May 6 for trademark violations stemming from the unauthorized scanning of 9,797 books. That number does not include titles that were scanned since the lawsuit was filed nor those owned by the publishers' subsidiaries, according to TheBookSeller.com.

The three publishing houses are seeking approximately $14 million in damages for "a fixed tariff of 1,000 euros per scanned book to which the publishers own the rights," a legal representative close to the matter told the AFP.

Google has denied any wrongdoing, noting that its Google Books initiative is in compliance with all domestic and international copyright regulations.

"We were surprised to receive this new claim... We remain convinced of the legality of Google Books," a company representative said in a statement. "We are committed to continue working with publishers to help them develop their digital offering and to make their works accessible to Internet users in France and abroad."

The lawsuit comes only six months after France's largest publisher, Hachette Livre, came to an accord with Google to allow the Internet firm to scan its out-of-print French books.

The 1,000 euros per title is in line with a similar Dec. 2009 lawsuit filed by another French publisher, La Martiniere. A Paris court found that Google violated the nation's copyright laws with its digital library project and awarded damages. The case is currently in appeal.

Google is no stranger to the court room, having been taken there several times just this year. The search engine giant is currently embroiled in a number of legal battles, including a recent suit in California that accuses Google and several other major tech firms of violating antitrust laws by conspiring to fix employee pay, as well as plotting to create “no solicitation” agreements with one another to prevent employee poaching.

The California tech company was also on Capitol Hill on Tuesday to answer questions about privacy issues related to smartphone use.


Beecher Tuttle is a TechZone360 contributor. He has extensive experience writing and editing for print publications and online news websites. He has specialized in a variety of industries, including health care technology, politics and education. To read more of his articles, please visit his columnist page.



Edited by Rich Steeves
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

TechZone360 Contributor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

How Is AI Bringing Intelligence to Traditionally Manual Inspection Workflows?

By: Contributing Writer    10/16/2026

For insurers, rental companies, fleet operators, and remarketing businesses, vehicle inspections are a part of everyday operations. Much of that proce…

Read More

3 Factors That Can Dramatically Impact Your Microsoft Intune Spend

By: Contributing Writer    10/13/2026

With remote and dispersed work here to stay for the long term, secure endpoint management has become a big headache for IT and cybersecurity teams. Th…

Read More

Why Threat Modeling Fails Without an Attacker's Perspective

By: Contributing Writer    10/13/2026

A security team might spend weeks mapping attack paths and planning defenses, only to be breached through a web application nobody remembered was stil…

Read More

From AI Experiment to Enterprise Strategy: Making Claude Work at Scale

By: Contributing Writer    10/12/2026

Artificial intelligence often enters an organization through experimentation. One employee discovers a useful prompt, another tests document analysis,…

Read More

SIEM needs exposure context to keep pace with AI-era threats

By: Contributing Writer    10/6/2026

Security information and event management (SIEM) platforms give security operations center (SOC) teams a central place to collect and analyze security…

Read More