Nasdaq Defends Amount of Money it Wants to Pay Out in Connection with Facebook's Problem-Plagued IPO

By Ed Silverstein September 20, 2012

Nasdaq has defended the amount of money it wants to spend to compensate Wall Street firms for technical problems occurring during the Facebook IPO.

The highly-anticipated May IPO was marked by delays and malfunctions – and led to the loss of millions of dollars.

A design flaw in computers reportedly delayed the opening of Facebook and created confusion.

Nasdaq OMX Group said the fund will cover “objective, discernible” losses, according to a posting found in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website.

Nasdaq used a formula that compared the firms’ executions for Facebook to the average price, weighted by the number of shares traded, according to a report from Bloomberg News.

Under its formula, Nasdaq OMX wanted to pay $62 million to the firms.

“Nasdaq believes that the accommodation proposal establishes a fair, transparent and equitable method of identifying categories of members for whom Nasdaq’s system issues caused objective, discernible loss,” Nasdaq said in the posting. “The purpose of the proposal is not to pay all claims of losses alleged with respect to the trading of Facebook stock, nor even all the claims of losses alleged to have been incurred on May 18.”

"The proposed accommodation pool goes well beyond what is required under current Nasdaq rules and specifically prioritizes the compensation of investors," Nasdaq added, according to a report from The Wall Street Journal.

Citigroup’s Automated Trading Desk may have lost about $20 million in the IPO, Reuters reported.

Citigroup disagreed with the formula Nasdaq wants to use for paying the losses; it wants a different benchmark price.

But Nasdaq disagrees.

“Nasdaq proposes to use a 45-minute window because 45 minutes should have been ample time for a reasonably diligent member to identify any unexpected losses or unanticipated positions and take steps to mitigate or liquidate them,” Nasdaq added. “This is a reasonable and objective approach given that trading firms typically process and determine actions on trading messages within seconds or fractions of seconds.”

UBS AG also wants more compensation than what the Nasdaq formula would allow.

The SEC may not decide until next year on what the correct formula will be, WSJ said.

In a related matter, the (U.K.) Independent claims Facebook was “furious” about technical problems the stock faced during the May IPO, TechZone360 said. Facebook blamed Nasdaq for the technical trading problems.

Reported The Independent: “It has even appeared to suggest that the trading glitches contributed to the collapse in the share price since the float.”




Edited by Braden Becker

TechZone360 Contributor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Cortana/Siri vs. Alexa & The Road To Robotic Post Smartphone Era

By: Rob Enderle    5/3/2016

Last week Microsoft made it clear that Cortana would only work with Microsoft's browser and search products making people question its cross platform …

Read More

Looking For The Next iPod/Echo

By: Rob Enderle    4/29/2016

The Amazon Echo, not the Apple Watch, became the last iPod-like product largely because of a far more accessible price point, a more compelling name, …

Read More

Apple Needs Reset, Not Elon Musk

By: Doug Mohney    4/29/2016

Apple's 13 percent sales decline and subsequent stock price drop this week has lead to the usual crazy talk about how to "fix" the company. Vivek Wadh…

Read More

Is the Apple Bubble Finally Bursting?

By: Andrew Bindelglass    4/28/2016

Over the past 13 years, Apple has been one of the most successful companies in the world of tech, posting sales growths in 51 straight quarters. That …

Read More

Shared-Space Providers (Airbnb) Poised to Beat Ride-Sharers (Uber)

By: Steve Anderson    4/28/2016

Travel may be starting to make a bit of a comeback, as a new report suggests that shared-space providers like Airbnb and WeWork are on the rise.

Read More