Good Technology, a pioneer in mobile e-mail founded in 1996, and much more recently a vendor that has expanded into secure enterprise mobility, announced that it has filed two separate patent infringement lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against mobile device management (MDM) vendors, MobileIron and AirWatch. Good Technology hasn’t been in the courts for some time, but is certainly no stranger to mobile patent conflicts.
When Good was an independent and privately held vendor (before being acquired by Motorola in November 2006), it was embroiled in various patent suits with Research in Motion (where it didn’t fare all that well). Visto, a Good competitor before it acquired Good from Motorola, (in a very interesting deal where a close reading of Motorola’s subsequent financial quarterly disclosures suggested – though we don’t claim this to be the case - that Motorola actually paid Visto to take Good off its hands), was also known for doing battle with Microsoft and RIM on patent issues. Visto fared well – it ultimately collected licensing fees from Microsoft and eventually won a substantial $267.5 million from RIM.
Image via Shutterstock
So it is quite interesting to see Good now reappear to add its name to the current crop of mobile patent wars players. The lawsuit against MobileIron, according to Good, also includes “Lanham Act and related claims alleging MobileIron engaged in a marketing campaign based on falsehoods and misleading claims about Good and its product offerings.”
The patents Good is asserting in each of the lawsuits include:
The combined Good and Visto has a fairly substantial patent portfolio of over 75 patents. This IP includes innovations in the area of mobile security and management, and a number of them are “early, highly-cited, foundational patents” according to Good. The patents cited above cover core technology first developed in the late 1990s that enable users to securely access e-mail and other business data while mobile.
King Lee, Good’s CEO says that, “Good has pioneered the technology and products critical to the backbone and safety of most mobile devices, and these lawsuits are about two blatant infringers of our technology – MobileIron and AirWatch. We have spent hundreds of millions of dollars researching, developing, and marketing our solutions. Thousands of organizations worldwide, including half of the Fortune 100, trust us to safely, efficiently and reliably scale their mobile enterprises, and we intend to vigorously defend our intellectual property rights around the world.”
It’s hard to tell if that is merely good pre-trial bluster from King or if there is much for MobileIron and AirWatch to be concerned about here. We’ll add this to our list of much-watch lawsuits and see how the pre-trial goes once it wends its way into an actual courtroom. We haven’t spoken with MobileIron or AirWatch yet, but we’re fairly certain about what they are going to say – something along the lines of baseless assertions and competitive distractions.
Welcome to the mobile litigation club one and all.
TechZone360 Senior Editor
Apple has one of the strongest legal teams in the segment; however, when a company starts using litigation offensively, it generally points to a probl…
Every year, an exciting new topic hits the tech industry, and it becomes a lot of what they talk about. This year, the focus has been on artificial in…
Christian Jensen is chief evangelist of Sinch, a cloud-based, mobile communications platform that makes it easy to add IM, SMS, verification, video, a…
While OneWeb is bringing new investment and more jobs into America as it builds a mega constellation of low-flying satellites for worldwide broadband …
Avaya turns to Chapter 11 bankruptcy in a bid to make some key changes and attempt to recover for the future.