Over the last week we've taken note of how Microsoft continues to sign up licensees for a patent portfolio it claims it owns that specifically cover Android. And as we continue to note, we are completely amused by Microsoft's ability to in fact do so. In fact Android could conceivably be contributing between $500 and $750 million to Microsoft's coffers on a yearly basis (there is no way to confirm this but various analysts have suggested as much). Most recently Microsoft signed up giant Hon Hai and ZTE.
Meanwhile, following its acquisition of Motorola Mobility, Google and Moto went on a supposed offensive to begin "cashing in" on Motorola's mobile patent portfolio, and immediately targeted Microsoft with a lawsuit that Google hoped would land it at least $4 billion or so. We ourselves thought this was a long shot for a number of reasons - among them that the patents in question were not the sort of patents from which company could generate huge licensing revenue. By this we mean Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) and "standards-essential" patents (SEP), which almost always earns nothing more than nominal licensing fees.
As it turns out, a federal court in Seattle agrees with our assessment, having just delivered a ruling yesterday by U.S. District Judge James Robart determining that Google and Motorola Mobility are entitled to about $1.8 million a year from Microsoft for the use of the patents in question, which have to do with the H.264 video standard and the 802.11 wireless standard. We're not going to dissect the ruling - suffice it to say that these are in fact legitimate FRAND patents, and Google and Motorola were crazy to ever think they'd be worth more than what the court has ruled them to be worth.
One of the key arguments for Google acquiring Motorola Mobility was that Google would in fact be able to unlock tremendous value from Motorola's patent portfolio, which would in turn hugely defray the cost of buying the company in the first place. Google blew it as far as we're concerned. There is far less money to unlock from Motorola's patent portfolio than Google imagined, which in turn makes the acquisition far pricier than Google had planned it to be. Can we conclude that Google overpaid for Motorola Mobility? We'd say so!
April has not been a good month for Google or Motorola as far as patents are concerned. Here is a summary:
That is quite a list of patent losses. For those interested in much greater detail, head over to Foss Patents. We don't feel bad for Google in this case. And we continue to be amused by Microsoft's ability to earn revenue off of Android.
TechZone360 Senior Editor
Less than a month into 2017, phone and cable companies are determined to crank up broadband speeds to gigabit levels and beyond. Existing technology w…
There are now three human carrying drone efforts on top of the half dozen or so flying car efforts currently, or soon to be, undergoing testing around…
Building the connections for the Internet of Things (IoT) is challenging, since applications, services, and devices of all different shapes, sizes, an…
Dell's new Latitude 7285 features WiTricity systems to work wirelessly, a principle similar to IoT operations.
Ahead of a sale to Verizon, Yahoo Inc. is poised to change its name, drop Marissa Mayer, and never be the same again.