At What Point Does Streaming Make More Sense than Satellite TV Delivery?


A 20-percent fall in the average cost of delivering streaming video, using a content delivery network (CDN), over the next few years will change the economics of video delivery, making Internet delivery cheaper than satellite, in many cases, argues Thomas Decieux, Nagravision head of product marketing, multi-screen solutions.

One has to make assumptions about the actual consumption, the number of users in a household, the number of streams any user would routinely use, image quality, CDN pricing and then more subjective issues to answer the question of whether a satellite TV provider would be able, at some point in the future, to make a rational business case for streaming over broadband connections rather than delivering content by satellite. But it is an interesting exercise.
Nagravision for example, has taken a look at costs to support a 250-channel standard-definition TV service requiring an average of 4Mbps, per channel, with 25.5 hours of viewing per user each week. Keep in mind the only issue is delivery channel. The analysis assumes all the rest of the licensing, marketing and operating functions are in place. 

Also, assume satellite transponders cost $3 million a year and a CDN cost $0.044 per GByte of transferred data. With those assumptions, a provider with about one million users might find delivery costs a wash, the analysis suggests. Below that level, a new entrant would be better off streaming. Decieux assumes further cost cuts for CDN service would continue to move the breakeven point up to perhaps two million subscribers. 

With larger customer bases, satellite delivery still will be cheaper, as multicasting or point-to-multipoint distribution simply is inherently more bandwidth efficient for delivering standard content to millions of users, compared to any unicast method. 

The largest satellite providers, such as DirecTV or Dish Network, will probably always find multicast a more-efficient choice. 

Smaller providers increasingly will find streaming a reasonable option, though. According to Nagra’s figures, CanalSat in France with five million subscribers could reach a point of cost neutrality as early as 2018, while BSkyB in the UK, Europe’s largest DTH operator with over 10 million customers, the point of cost equivalence would be reached in 2021.

Nagra’s main argument is that new service providers should seriously consider delivering over CDNs from day one and not bother with satellite at all. There are caveats. Thinly populated or rural areas might not have broadband access at speeds high enough to deliver a consistent high quality experience. Access provider usage caps also will be a factor. Also, content owners will have to be assured that piracy issues are controllable.

Edited by Brooke Neuman

Contributing Editor

Related Articles

AI and the Future of Privacy: Computer Vision Solutions and Privacy

By: Special Guest    7/21/2021

Discover the ways AI and computer vision can complement digital security systems. See the challenges and ethical obstacles it faces on the road to mak…

Read More

Multisignature Wallet: How does it work?

By: Special Guest    7/21/2021

A multisignature wallet ensures that people are able to sign transactions and documents as a group. It is a type of digital signature that is generate…

Read More

How IoT Transforms The Retail Industry

By: Special Guest    7/20/2021

IoT (Internet of Things) is an integrated system that works via the network of short-range mobile transceivers supplemented in electronic devices, fun…

Read More

Why is Aircall the best VoIP provider?

By: Special Guest    7/20/2021

Setting up VoIP for your business also means you must call on a VoIP provider. Find out why Aircall is the best choice for your company.

Read More

Making Room for Innovation to Flourish

By: Special Guest    7/16/2021

Innovators face several challenges in established organizations, cultural challenges are one of them. This often leads to the establishment of a physi…

Read More