Will Google Design its Own Processors?

By

Though some think the idea is a leaked negotiating ploy, there’s a rumor Google might design its own server processors. The idea might seem farfetched, but Google now builds many related products it might otherwise buy.

Operating systems, browsers, PCs, tablets, smart phones, global backbone networks, access networks and data centers are among the inputs and outputs Google now directly supplies, when it might simply source them externally from third parties. That is one reason any rumor about moving to customer processors does not seem wildly out of place.

According to the rumor, Google is considering designing its own server processors using technology from ARM Holdings. In principle, by using its own designs, Google could better manage the interactions between hardware and software.

Any such move could prompt other major application providers, who also rely on their own data centers to support cloud operations, to make their own moves, with obvious implications for Intel, which supplies most of the server processors used in such devices.

Google alone is Intel’s fifth largest customer, according to Bloomberg, buying at least $500 million worth of Intel server chips each year.

As much as Intel would have reason to fear such a move, rival ARM would obviously gain, particularly since, though ARM is a major supplier in mobile devices, ARM has small presence in the server end of the business.

Intel, conversely, has little share in the mobile devices market, where low power consumption is a big issue.

Google in August 2013 joined OpenPOWER, a new initiative under which IBM will license the core intellectual property for POWER technologies to other companies for use in designing servers employed in cloud data centers.

OpenPOWER makes it possible for cloud services and their technology providers to redesign processors and circuit boards to optimize the interactions of microprocessors, memory, networking, data storage and other components.

As a result, they can get servers that are custom-tuned for their applications. That would suggest there is something to the rumor, despite legitimate skepticism.




Edited by Cassandra Tucker
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

Contributing Editor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Why More Leads Won't Fix a Broken Lead Management Process

By: Contributing Writer    6/23/2026

When sales results start to stall, many organizations immediately look to the top of the funnel for answers. The assumption is simple: if revenue i…

Read More

Your Post-Quantum Readiness Starts at Y2Q Summit

By: TMCnet News    5/27/2026

Y2Q Summit is an executive conference focused on helping enterprises prepare for the coming era of quantum computing disruption, cybersecurity transfo…

Read More

Why Award Marketing Should Be Part of Every B2B Tech Company's Growth Strategy

By: Erik Linask    5/20/2026

Award marketing matters for B2B tech companies because industry recognition can strengthen trust, support sales and partner relationships, improve con…

Read More

Why Email Is Still the Most Underrated Layer of Modern Software Infrastructure

By: Contributing Writer    5/15/2026

Take, for example, the following scenario. A user requests a password reset, waits a few seconds, refreshes their inbox and nothing arrives. They try …

Read More

Jitterbit's Visionary Status Signals a Shift in the iPaaS Market

By: Contributing Writer    4/7/2026

As enterprise ecosystems grow more complex, integration has become less of a backend IT function and more of a strategic driver of business performanc…

Read More