Fun with Numbers: 'Adjusted' Dot-Bomb Financials Return to Wall St.

By

They say history repeats itself, but the signs coming out of Wall St. are reminding analysts of a history many don’t want to repeat. Adjusted financial reporting is making a comeback as hundreds of companies in the United States have resorted to financial shell games in their corporate earnings reports. By using these numbers, companies are able to present improved statistics in the form of 'adjusted' net income, 'adjusted' sales, and 'adjusted Ebitda'. The changes have allowed some companies to create the illusion of double digit improvements.

One undisclosed company is using adjusted metrics internally to evaluate management and compare its performance to rivals. The rules are complex, but these kinds of reports often fly in the face of securities regulations, making this an interesting dance for companies to venture into.

According to reports, one out of every ten major securities filings made this year used the term adjusted Ebidta, which represent adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization. The number of companies using this metric is rising, too. Only one out of forty companies used these methods a decade ago. In fact, about 25 percent of the filings this past year used figures that didn't comply with generally accepted accounting principles. 

Whether this renaissance of unusual accounting methods is the product of evolving accounting community practices, corporate pressure, or an indicator of something darker, people are starting to notice. The adjusted financial terms have been seen in securities filings, quarterly earnings releases, as well as standard financial reports. Ultimately, Wall St. and investors are left to decide whether these practices are something they are willing to accept or whether it is something that reminds of a financial disaster of the technology era. These kinds of financial shell games are nothing new, but there is an explicit danger should they become largely accepted or ignored. In any case, they introduce confusion into an already complicated market and make analysis that much more difficult. 




Edited by Kyle Piscioniere
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

How Is AI Bringing Intelligence to Traditionally Manual Inspection Workflows?

By: Contributing Writer    10/16/2026

For insurers, rental companies, fleet operators, and remarketing businesses, vehicle inspections are a part of everyday operations. Much of that proce…

Read More

3 Factors That Can Dramatically Impact Your Microsoft Intune Spend

By: Contributing Writer    10/13/2026

With remote and dispersed work here to stay for the long term, secure endpoint management has become a big headache for IT and cybersecurity teams. Th…

Read More

Why Threat Modeling Fails Without an Attacker's Perspective

By: Contributing Writer    10/13/2026

A security team might spend weeks mapping attack paths and planning defenses, only to be breached through a web application nobody remembered was stil…

Read More

From AI Experiment to Enterprise Strategy: Making Claude Work at Scale

By: Contributing Writer    10/12/2026

Artificial intelligence often enters an organization through experimentation. One employee discovers a useful prompt, another tests document analysis,…

Read More

SIEM needs exposure context to keep pace with AI-era threats

By: Contributing Writer    10/6/2026

Security information and event management (SIEM) platforms give security operations center (SOC) teams a central place to collect and analyze security…

Read More