How Amazon Reversed Microsoft's Strategy to Help Lenovo Create a Better Home AI

By

At CES this past week, Lenovo made an interesting move by licensing the Alexa platform and building its own version of Amazon Echo called the “Smart Assistant.”  It wasn’t the only one; Huawei shipped an Alexa phone and Ford announced it will eventually have cars that feature Alexa.  Alexa is now one hot property thanks to Amazon’s licensing strategy, which may become a problem. 

Alexa is in the news for other things this week.  Apparently, a child talking to her Echo ordered an expensive doll house by accident and TV news picked the story up. Unfortunately, while reporting the incident, the newscaster explained how this had been done.  Echos that were near TVs during the report then heard the commands and ordered the same Doll house. This incident is troublesome because it suggests that if Amazon wants to increase sales all it needs to do is run similar ads on TV or radio and, presto, it could set sales records!

But what I find particularly interesting is that Amazon appears to be executing Microsoft’s old “Plays-For-Sure” strategy better than Microsoft did.  Or, said a different way, Amazon is showcasing how “Plays-For-Sure” could have actually worked and beat the iPod.  

Why Plays-For-Sure Failed

Plays-For-Sure was Microsoft’s platform for music around the time the iPod launched.  Basically, an OEM could license this platform, put it on their hardware, and instantly have an iPod-like device.  Unfortunately, it wasn’t as intuitive as the iPod, the hardware that the OEMs brought out wasn’t as nice, and Microsoft finally gave up and brought out Zune while killing the offering. 

Why Zune Failed

Zune was simply wrong headed.  It started out being a relatively unattractive player with a big screen (the iPad didn’t have a screen) which could play videos but lacked video content.  At the time, it was very hard to get digital video.  Its “killer feature” was the ability to share music for free, except that required both people sharing to have a subscription to Microsoft’s music service. At the time, most folks had iPods, so this killer feature didn’t work for them.  Eventually, Microsoft made a far more attractive product and got video to work but, by then, so did Apple. Consequently, Zune died out.  

Amazon Effectively Started Where Zune Ended

Zune ended up with an attractive player that worked.  This is where Amazon started with the Echo, which was a fully featured product that worked.  What remains kind of amazing, given the Echo is basically a music player at heart, is how Apple missed this boat entirely.   But once Amazon had an attractive working product, it then moved to its “Plays-For-Sure” -like strategy. The difference here is that Amazon’s actually worked and it’d set a high bar with regard to hardware design.  Thus…

Lenovo’s Smart Assistant

Thus, the Smart Assistant launched by Lenovo had to exceed the bar set by Echo, and it does.  It is more attractive, comes in colors, and has a better sound system while still having at its heart the same Alexa platform that the Echo had pioneered.  This is a win for both vendors because Amazon makes a far higher percentage of profit from a license than it does building hardware, the product is still connected back into Amazon’s store for additional revenue, and Lenovo can market a product that potentially has a larger market than Amazon’s own (particularly in China). Ultimately, this becomes an entry product for Lenovo into the home and related IoT offerings. 

Wrapping Up: 

Amazon is showcasing with its Alexa platform that Microsoft’s Plays-For-Sure strategy was backwards but still a good idea.  Rather than licensing first and then moving to ever more attractive hardware, it is far more successful to start with an attractive product benchmark and then license out after proving the concept works and setting a high enough bar for hardware design.  The end result is that Amazon has been very successful, first with its own products, and now with products from companies like Huawei, Lenovo, and potentially even Ford. 

So, the correct way to execute “Plays-For-Sure” is to do exactly the opposite of what Microsoft did.  Go figure?  




Edited by Alicia Young

President and Principal Analyst, Enderle Group

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Coding and Invention Made Fun

By: Special Guest    10/12/2018

SAM is a series of kits that integrates hardware and software with the Internet. Combining wireless building blocks composed of sensors and actors con…

Read More

Facebook Marketplace Now Leverages AI

By: Paula Bernier    10/3/2018

Artificial intelligence is changing the way businesses interact with customers. Facebook's announcement this week is just another example of how this …

Read More

Oct. 17 Webinar to Address Apache Spark Benefits, Tools

By: Paula Bernier    10/2/2018

In the upcoming webinar "Apache Spark: The New Enterprise Backbone for ETL, Batch and Real-time Streaming," industry experts will offer details on clo…

Read More

It's Black and White: Cybercriminals Are Spending 10x More Than Enterprises to Control, Disrupt and Steal

By: Cynthia S. Artin    9/26/2018

In a stunning new report by Carbon Black, "Hacking, Escalating Attacks and The Role of Threat Hunting" the company revealed that 92% of UK companies s…

Read More

6 Challenges of 5G, and the 9 Pillars of Assurance Strategy

By: Special Guest    9/17/2018

To make 5G possible, everything will change. The 5G network will involve new antennas and chipsets, new architectures, new KPIs, new vendors, cloud di…

Read More