WannaCry? No, It's Worse in New Ransomware Attack

By

A recent outbreak of ransomware attacks on what amounted to a global scale struck recently as computers throughout large portions of Europe and Asia were slammed by programs that locked computers and demanded payment to open them back up. While much of the wave seems to be contained—at least for now—it has the subject of cybersecurity back on everybody's lips.

Ukraine seemed to be the biggest target in all this, as its transportation industry, its power companies, and both its government and its National Bank were all on ground zero. That didn't make Ukraine the only target by any stretch, as reports emerged of providers hit worldwide and striking at major infrastructure operations.

Many cited WannaCry as the likely culprit, though some security experts believed the Petya breed was involved instead. More specifically, it's a new offshoot called “NotPetya.” NotPetya is said to be similar to Petya, but with sufficient differences to make it its own breed of ransomware. NotPetya's origins can be traced back to the National Security Administration (NSA) and its EternalBlue hack, which is actually at last report where WannaCry came from. NotPetya, meanwhile, only scans computers on a local network rather than the entire Internet.

While recent reports suggest that the ransomware outbreak is under control in Ukraine, and the attacks taking on worldwide operations—from Danish shipping firm Maersk to United States pharmaceutical firm Merck—are trailing off, the latest outbreak may be nearly done. That isn't to say it's stopped, or will stop for long, but it's clear that ransomware will continue to be a problem.

Why? Simple: it works. And works well, too, by some reports; not only are these attacks able to make headway because many firms are still using outdated technology, but said firms also aren't engaging in proper patch discipline and installing necessary patches that would have protected against such issues in the first place. With an increasingly interconnected world, we must have the tools to protect ourselves against malware like this, and many simply aren't using them. Throw in the comparatively low costs demanded by ransomware practitioners—some reports suggested $300 in bitcoin was enough to unlock a system from this latest attack—and the costs of paying up actually seem less than paying for new systems or for IT to run patches.

As long as ransomware remains a comparative bargain and companies continue to operate with old, unpatched hardware, we'll likely continue to see such attacks take place. That's not good news for those of us who depend on power, fuel, and other such matters.




Edited by Alicia Young

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

SEPTA Puts ZeroEyes on Public Gun Safety

By: Greg Tavarez    11/28/2022

SEPTA looked to ZeroEyes to start a pilot program designed to reduce the likelihood of gun-related violence on train platforms.

Read More

Brand Interaction in Metaverse? Consumers Express Excitement

By: Greg Tavarez    11/25/2022

Almost three-fourths of consumers believe brand interactions in the metaverse are in a position to replace brand interactions in the real-world, or at…

Read More

WB Trading Review Guide To Top Tech For Trading Success

By: Contributing Writer    11/23/2022

There are many different types of technology that you can use when it comes to trading investments. This WB Trading review will discuss some of the to…

Read More

United (Fungi) Front: Industry Leaders Join Forces to Advance Sustainable Protein

By: Matthew Vulpis    11/18/2022

Mush Foods teamed up with several fungi fermentation companies from abroad to form a new international trade association: The Fungi Protein Associatio…

Read More

What Is Banking CRM and How Can It Help You?

By: Contributing Writer    11/15/2022

When most people think about CRM, they think about sales and marketing. But CRM banking is a powerful tool that can help banks and credit unions impro…

Read More