Google's Vint Cerf Says Social Media Should Not Require Real Names

By

If you’ve ever used the Internet anonymously, chances are it was for social reasons. You have unpopular opinions you don’t want connected to your real name, you’re pretending to be someone you’re not or you simply enjoy a good bout of trolling.

In many developing nations, using the Internet anonymously is a matter of personal safety: governments cracking down on free expression or politically unpopular opinions can mean punishment, jail time and worse in many nations.

While preventing users from using pseudonyms on the Internet can solve a lot of problems in the U.S. – cutting cyber-bullying and particularly noxious trolling (posting on message boards and in social media with no other purpose but to upset and offend others) – it could endanger the lives of others in politically unstable regions of the world.

For this reason, senior Google executive and Internet legend, Vint Cerf, says Google and others should not force Internet users to reveal their real names for some services, including his company’s Google+ social network.

Social media has played an important role as of late in companies with unstable political environments. Many of the “Arab Spring” uprisings were given global media exposure only through mobile social media postings, as governments shut down websites, newspapers and other media that allowed people inside these countries to communicate with the outside world or record and share video of violence against protestors.

Cerf spoke with Reuters recently and indicated that Google’s insistence on instituting real-name authentication for Google+ and other services has sparked intense debate and some disagreement within the company. But he argued that current name policy, which allows for some users to display pseudonyms, offers adequate "choice" in how users choose to represent themselves.

"Using real names is useful," Cerf said. "But I don't think it should be forced on people, and I don't think we do."

Digital rights activists have accused two of the Internet industry's most influential players – Facebook and Google – of leading the charge against anonymity by pushing its users to identify themselves, which can turn up valuable information for two companies that essentially make money by advertising and tracking user behavior, reported Reuters.




Edited by Braden Becker
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

TechZone360 Contributor

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

View the Masters Tournament from New Perspective Provided by IBM

By: Greg Tavarez    3/30/2023

IBM and the Masters introduced two innovative new features as part of the Masters app and Masters.com digital experience.

Read More

Small Businesses Gain Confidence with Mastercard Easy Savings on McAfee Security Solutions

By: Greg Tavarez    3/29/2023

McAfee and Mastercard expanded their partnership to offer Mastercard Business cardholders automatic savings on online protection solutions from McAfee…

Read More

Through OpenAI Plugins, ChatGPT Can Officially Access the Internet

By: Alex Passett    3/28/2023

OpenAI released plugin features for ChatGPT that enable it to connect to third-party sites, in essence granting it access to the internet past its pre…

Read More

Complete Guide to Passwordless Login

By: Contributing Writer    3/27/2023

Passwordless login is a security method that eliminates the need for traditional passwords by using alternative means to verify a user's identity. Thi…

Read More

What the Fall of Silicon Valley Bank Means for the Future of Venture Capital

By: Special Guest    3/27/2023

With a projected recession on the horizon, venture capitalists were already pulling back on new investments and concentrating on solidifying their exi…

Read More