Microsoft Given $733M Fine by European Union for Failing to Provide Browser Choice

By

Microsoft was hit with a $733-million fine today, handed down by the European Union for failing to offer Windows users with a choice of Internet browsers to install when they install the operating system. While Microsoft is no stranger to fines of this nature, this is a first for the EU's executive arm, the European Commission, as no company has failed to comply with EU authorities before.

What's interesting is that Microsoft had plenty of time to comply — since 2009, in fact. At that time, the Commission ordered the company to extend browser choices rather than providing access exclusively to Internet Explorer on fresh Windows installs.

At that time, Microsoft agreed to pay a fine amounting to around $1.1 billion and promised to give Windows users the option of choosing a browser other than IE.

"In 2009, we closed our investigation about a suspected abuse of dominant position by Microsoft due to the tying of Internet Explorer to Windows by accepting commitments offered by the company," said the European Union's antitrust commissioner, Joaquin Almunia, in a statement. "Legally binding commitments reached in antitrust decisions play a very important role in our enforcement policy because they allow for rapid solutions to competition problems. Of course, such decisions require strict compliance. A failure to comply is a very serious infringement that must be sanctioned accordingly."

Almunia went on to add that the fine given to Microsoft today reflects both the size of the violation and the length of time it went on for. The Commission also sought to make an example of Microsoft in order to deter other companies from noncompliance.

Since 1998, Microsoft has paid $2.86 billion in fines to the European Commission, when investigations were first opened into the company after Sun Microsystems alleged it was denied access to technical documents. In 2008, Microsoft was fined about $1.17 billion for failing to provide details to allow other companies' products to interoperate with its own.

The company sought to have the fine reduced in 2011.




Edited by Braden Becker
Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. [Free eNews Subscription]

TechZone360 Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Why More Leads Won't Fix a Broken Lead Management Process

By: Contributing Writer    6/23/2026

When sales results start to stall, many organizations immediately look to the top of the funnel for answers. The assumption is simple: if revenue i…

Read More

Your Post-Quantum Readiness Starts at Y2Q Summit

By: TMCnet News    5/27/2026

Y2Q Summit is an executive conference focused on helping enterprises prepare for the coming era of quantum computing disruption, cybersecurity transfo…

Read More

Why Award Marketing Should Be Part of Every B2B Tech Company's Growth Strategy

By: Erik Linask    5/20/2026

Award marketing matters for B2B tech companies because industry recognition can strengthen trust, support sales and partner relationships, improve con…

Read More

Why Email Is Still the Most Underrated Layer of Modern Software Infrastructure

By: Contributing Writer    5/15/2026

Take, for example, the following scenario. A user requests a password reset, waits a few seconds, refreshes their inbox and nothing arrives. They try …

Read More

Jitterbit's Visionary Status Signals a Shift in the iPaaS Market

By: Contributing Writer    4/7/2026

As enterprise ecosystems grow more complex, integration has become less of a backend IT function and more of a strategic driver of business performanc…

Read More