Feds Ramp Up Cyber-Spending

By

Palo Alto Networks, FireEye, Fortinet and CyberArk Software have all put in bids for the $14 billion up for grabs in fiscal 2016 cybersecurity spending by the federal government. The four are battling it out, according to Business Insider, representing a fresh flurry of security investment by the feds.

And it’s about time. According to the U.S. Government Accountability Office, between fiscal years 2006 and 2014, cyberattacks on federal agencies increased nearly 12 times over, from 5,503 to 67,168. And, the flow of threats does not seem to be letting up.

In May, hackers accessed about 334,000 taxpayer accounts. More recently, in October, the U.S. Postal Service was targeted. The scope of that hack is still under investigation. But the recent attack on the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) was perhaps the most headline-grabbing.

The federal government’s main employment body revealed in August that about 22.1 million individuals had their Social Security Numbers and other sensitive information affected by a pair of hacks. In addition, 5.6 million people are now estimated to have had their fingerprint information stolen—which could have a big impact on future biometric security initiatives.

Image via Pixabay

State-sponsored attacks are also continuing: China is reportedly continuing hacking attacks on U.S. firms in spite of a pact that banned government spying on companies; authorities are probing a potential Russian hack of Dow Jones; and ISIS has reportedly tried to hack the U.S. electrical grid.

Yet, despite the escalating threat level, the GAO also revealed that the between 2014 and 2016, federal cybersecurity spending grew only 40% — compared with the 1,100% increase in attacks over the past eight years.

Changes are afoot that will increase the focus on cybersecurity, however. After intense debate, the Senate has passed the controversial Cybersecurity Information Act bill, which makes the Department of Homeland Security into a hub for sharing information about cyber-attacks within the government and the private sector. The bill, which has faced privacy concerns from high-tech firms and advocacy groups, must now be reconciled with a separate piece of legislation that was passed by the House of Representatives earlier this year.




Edited by Kyle Piscioniere

Contributing Writer

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
Related Articles

Mavatar and STAR Make Shop-able Wall Sharp

By: Maurice Nagle    3/14/2019

Today, omnichannel commerce company Mavatar unveiled a partnership with Sharp's Strategic Technology Alliance Resource (STAR), which will result in Ma…

Read More

CX Metrics in the Age of AI

By: Special Guest    3/13/2019

We're all familiar with traditional measurement of contact center operations; they've been part of the industry for decades. With the growth of the In…

Read More

Contact Centers Go Cloud in Order to Connect the Dots in Their Data

By: Erik Linask    3/11/2019

Businesses are faced with a difficult challenge. They have a pressing need to accommodate an increasingly tech-savvy customer base with evolving engag…

Read More

Three Ways You Can Support International Women's Day, Every Day

By: Special Guest    3/8/2019

When we think about our role as a corporate citizen in bringing about the change International Women's Day seeks, we need to look at where we've progr…

Read More

Leading Women in Technology Speak Out on Opportunities for Females to Thrive on International Women's Day 2019

By: Arti Loftus    3/8/2019

We checked in with some of the top women executives in the technology world, to get their thoughts on how we can continue to support everything from e…

Read More